Sorry Cue but you're wrong. Of course its about politics. The Cons introduced this legislation after same sex marriage was legalized. Funny thing is, even though I lean Democratic, i agree with the bill.
If you have Male parts, you use the Mens restroom. I have 2 daughters under the age of 16. They might one day see a Man undressed. It just shouldn't be in a public restroom.
You cant legislate morality, however you can legislate actions. No one is going to volunteer to check to see who has what. However, when harassment or worse rape occurs, now the owners of said bathrooms are liable. Just because you dress as a woman or feel like a woman doesnt make you one. If those who want to force their beliefs upon the majority, just practiced decorum, this conversation wouldnt take place.
The bill was rescinded not because legislators changed theyre mind about transgenders, it was because of all the lost income (ACC tourney, NBA all star game, concerts, employers). Thats political as it gets.
How this ties in to UNC and State? With both being State runned schools, there would be alot of politics going around about trying to leave the ACC. The income loss would be astronomical, even if the SEC bailed them out and picked both up. As i said before, SEC States are in league with the NC legislators. Texas introduced or is planning to introduce a bill similar to one NC passed and rescinded. The ACC would own Tv tights for 20 yrs.
Sorry to be longwinded, but this is political to the T, and its the brainchild of the right.