Is this concerning to anyone? I have been an advocate of Brohm to UL, but maybe look around some and not be laser focused on JB? Also, he did lose to Eastern Michigan at home. That game counted as much as we want to act like it didn't.
It won't concern some people, but it should. When everybody was gangbusters about bringing Petrino back for 2.0 there should have been some reservations then. Some people never learn. it's all or bust. Even if Purdue loses out and Vince doesn't make a move for Jeff this fan base will explode. I predict a small explosion for just mentioning it in this post.Is this concerning to anyone? I have been an advocate of Brohm to UL, but maybe look around some and not be laser focused on JB? Also, he did lose to Eastern Michigan at home. That game counted as much as we want to act like it didn't.
Is it POSSIBLE that word is getting around the Purdue locker room that Brohm may be gone and the team isn't reacting positively about that possibility?
Who is he? It sound like some guy who sells hay out of a machine?Brent Vendebales
Holt is not a good defense coordinatorThe downside to hiring JB is that he brings Nick Holt with him.
Holt is not a good defense coordinator
your kidding rightHolt is a huge reason why Purdue did so well last year.
Holt is not a good defense coordinator
Holt is a huge reason why Purdue did so well last year.
Wasn’t he fired once before from U of L?
Morgantown, let me help you with your rural twang, it's "sumbitch" one word. lol Young teams win games they have no business winning and lose some they have no business losing. Unless it's our young team, then we consistently have 70 yard TD runs up the middle where Famurewa plays all night long. Give up more than 50 points in more games, it's easily a school record.
Is this concerning to anyone? I have been an advocate of Brohm to UL, but maybe look around some and not be laser focused on JB? Also, he did lose to Eastern Michigan at home. That game counted as much as we want to act like it didn't.
How so? Since the talk started, Purdue has beat OSU and Iowa. If you think today is a product of the talk, your wrong. Today is the same stuff that has happened in every loss this year.I think all the talk of Brohm leaving for Louisville having a negative effect on the Purdue team is a valid theory. It has to have some effect. I also agree that this is just the second year of his rebuild at Purdue and you can’t expect that team to be world beaters at this stage. They do, however, show a lot of promise. All that said, I’d say the odds of Brohm being on UL’s sideline next year is about 85% right now. And, if not Brohm, there are several enticing possibilities, including Venables. In any case, I’m more stoked about next years team than this year’s next game.
Well, after the OSU beat down the talk of Brohm to Louisville ramped up dramatically thus increasing the fear factor of the team losing their coach exponentially. And, if you are a Purdue grad (I am a UL grad) and you are incorrectly using “your” instead of “you’re” we need not discuss any further.How so? Since the talk started, Purdue has beat OSU and Iowa. If you think today is a product of the talk, your wrong. Today is the same stuff that has happened in every loss this year.
I honestly don't pay attention to Grammer on discussion boards and twitter. Not like im getting grade or anything... but I actually changed my major so I no longer attend Purdue. Might go back there for my Master of Accounting though. Kind of want to see if I can get into an ivy league for kicks and gigs though.Well, after the OSU beat down the talk of Brohm to Louisville ramped up dramatically thus increasing the fear factor of the team losing their coach exponentially. And, if you are a Purdue grad (I am a UL grad) and you are incorrectly using “your” instead of “you’re” we need not discuss any further.
Brohm now has a losing record (9-10) in his head coaching career against UNranked Power Five teams.
Inexplicably, he has an almost identical record percentage-wise against the ranked teams he's played (4-5). He's played those teams with the same staff of coaches and roster of players. And I haven't checked, but he's probably played a higher percentage of those ranked teams on the road.
The question is whether that justifies an $18 million gamble...
Zipp, my first reaction to that data is that the record vs ranked teams is probably better than that of all but 10 active coaches. Second, the record against unranked teams is roughly average for a P5 coach.Brohm now has a losing record (9-10) in his head coaching career against UNranked Power Five teams.
Inexplicably, he has an almost identical record percentage-wise against the ranked teams he's played (4-5). He's played those teams with the same staff of coaches and roster of players. And I haven't checked, but he's probably played a higher percentage of those ranked teams on the road.
The question is whether that justifies an $18 million gamble...
Brohm now has a losing record (9-10) in his head coaching career against UNranked Power Five teams.
Inexplicably, he has an almost identical record percentage-wise against the ranked teams he's played (4-5). He's played those teams with the same staff of coaches and roster of players. And I haven't checked, but he's probably played a higher percentage of those ranked teams on the road.
The question is whether that justifies an $18 million gamble...
Zipp, my first reaction to that data is that the record vs ranked teams is probably better than that of all but 10 active coaches. Second, the record against unranked teams is roughly average for a P5 coach.
Third, I would guess his vector is pretty good.
The roster is never the same, year to year.Brohm now has a losing record (9-10) in his head coaching career against UNranked Power Five teams.
Inexplicably, he has an almost identical record percentage-wise against the ranked teams he's played (4-5). He's played those teams with the same staff of coaches and roster of players. And I haven't checked, but he's probably played a higher percentage of those ranked teams on the road.
The question is whether that justifies an $18 million gamble...
Good luck to you. Just some advice, anytime you are writing or speaking in a public forum you should be careful with your grammar. Poor grammar, spelling and delivery can undermine your message.I honestly don't pay attention to Grammer on discussion boards and twitter. Not like im getting grade or anything... but I actually changed my major so I no longer attend Purdue. Might go back there for my Master of Accounting though. Kind of want to see if I can get into an ivy league for kicks and gigs though.
Don’t forget Wisconsin. They’llPurdue is not built currently for bad weather games because they don't have a good enough running game. Quarterback has issues in cold weather...Mich St and here.
This is a bigger factor than people think, Purdue is in the Big Tens weakest division. Northwestern just won the division at 5-4. There are no powerhouses on that side until Nebraska gets rolling again which is coming. As long as Brohm can recruit like he is now he will contend every year. Louisville has a legit Powerhouse team in Clemson, unless Dabo leaves that is a steep hill to climb.
You are in a world of hurt, frigging weirdo
Because you just got your brains beat in at Minnesota and Louisville just pulled the trigger on BP...proving that they're more than capable of buying out Petrino's balance and pursuing Jeff Brohm!!! He's gone, pal!World of hurt why? That thread the other day was hilarious on your board.