I really have to disagree with this. Coach Willard took Seton Hall from the Big East basement and consistently got the Pirates into the tournament. I don't understand the dissing of Willard by Cards fans and comparing him to Coach Mack is just laziness.This is like setting money on fire - what a terrible choice by Maryland. Coaching landscape these days is barren…
He’s a nice guy but he doesn’t move the needle at a place with some tradition like Maryland. Honestly I think the comparisons to Mack are apt - and not just because both are skinny, bald white guys. I don’t think Willard will prove any more ready for a P5 program than Mack was. Time - as always - will tell.I really have to disagree with this. Coach Willard took Seton Hall from the Big East basement and consistently got the Pirates into the tournament. I don't understand the dissing of Willard by Cards fans and comparing him to Coach Mack is just laziness.
Maryland is a good place for him and a improvement over the previous coach. I'm not saying he's a top level head coach but he's not a dog like some here state. He's a good recruiter as well.
So you don't include The Big East as a power conference? Villanova and Providence would disagree.He’s a nice guy but he doesn’t move the needle at a place with some tradition like Maryland. Honestly I think the comparisons to Mack are apt - and not just because both are skinny, bald white guys. I don’t think Willard will prove any more ready for a P5 program than Mack was. Time - as always - will tell.
Kevin Willard has proven he can coach and it's ridiculous to say Maryland is burning its money. Is Louisville burning its money? Do you think that about hiring Kenny Payne? Willard certainly is less of a gamble than Payne?
I really have to disagree with this. Coach Willard took Seton Hall from the Big East basement and consistently got the Pirates into the tournament. I don't understand the dissing of Willard by Cards fans and comparing him to Coach Mack is just laziness.
Maryland is a good place for him and a improvement over the previous coach. I'm not saying he's a top level head coach but he's not a dog like some here state. He's a good recruiter as well.
It’s not me that doesn’t include the BE - it’s everyone. Does that mean that there’s not good basketball programs outside of the P5? Of course there are but the reality is, there’s a lot of differences between a Maryland and Seton Hall. Or a Xavier and UofL.So you don't include The Big East as a power conference? Villanova and Providence would disagree.
Kevin Willard has proven he can coach and it's ridiculous to say Maryland is burning its money. Is Louisville burning its money? Do you think that about hiring Kenny Payne? Willard certainly is less of a gamble than Payne?
I really don't care who applauds who and you shouldn't use that in your argument. You saying Payne's ceiling is higher than Willard is just wishful thinking and has no basis in fact. You just like KP and Willard not so much. You think Maryland fans would rather have Payne? Come on!It’s not me that doesn’t include the BE - it’s everyone. Does that mean that there’s not good basketball programs outside of the P5? Of course there are but the reality is, there’s a lot of differences between a Maryland and Seton Hall. Or a Xavier and UofL.
Time will also tell about UofL hiring Payne when it comes down to what matters most - winning. He might be a complete bust but I think that his ceiling is dramatically higher than Willard’s. KP’s hiring has also been almost universally applauded - don’t think you can say the same with Willard’s - even among Maryland fans.
Wow - you’ve really worked yourself up on this topic. Lot to unpack here so, let’s go!I really don't care who applauds who and you shouldn't use that in your argument. You saying Payne's ceiling is higher than Willard is just wishful thinking and has no basis in fact. You just like KP and Willard not so much. You think Maryland fans would rather have Payne? Come on!
And for me at least, the power 5 is associated with football. In hoops the Big East is a power conference. Nobody I've heard on TV says otherwise.
There's multiple title winners Villanova and Uconn. Providence is a win away from the elite 8. Butler is a two time runner up and Creighton, Seton Hall and Xavier all have been consistent NCAA tournament participants. Even the teams that are currently down like Georgetown and St. Johns have blue blood pedigrees.
The Big East is not a mid major conference like the AAC or C-USA. Not even close.
This is like setting money on fire - what a terrible choice by Maryland. Coaching landscape these days is barren…
The 3 key words in that sentence is “at Seton Hall”. Who else has been successful there? He’s a good coach. We’ll see if the resources at Maryland are a factor. Is he worse than Mark Turgeon?In 12 years at Seton Hall, he had 1 ncaa tourney win. Just a very uninspiring hire imo.
Another coach fans were suggesting Louisville hire this will be interesting also.
You don't know what I meant with applaud? You used that exact word and I was mocking it. Now do you know what it means?Wow - you’ve really worked yourself up on this topic. Lot to unpack here so, let’s go!
1. The BE not being a P5 has nothing to do with who “applauds (me)” - whatever that means. It’s not my opinion, it’s a universally recognized fact - including by the ncaa - that the BE is not a P5 conference. You of course are free to hold whatever opinion you want on the subject - I mean you’re incorrect but hey, you do you.
2. P5 conference is more than a designation regarding competitive strength in a particular sport - including basketball. The primary differences are typically annual budgets - which are driven by conference affiliation and the money distributed by those conferences which as we all know are a result of tv money for football. Seton Hall’s budget would be minuscule compared to Maryland’s and having to manage a much larger program and budget - not to mention greater fan expectations - has doomed many a mid major coach trying to make the jump.
3. I’ve met Willard - actually had a couple of beers with him on one occasion as part of a larger group - while he was at UofL. He was really nice and I have zero against him. I hope that he does well - I mean he won’t but - I’ve no reason to root against him.
4. Willard’s body of work is a known. As KnuckleHank said - 1 tourney win in 12 years. Not impressive at all - even for a mid major. In comparison, IMO Payne - given his connections and the length and breadth of his supporters and universal respect both in the pro and college game - has a significantly higher ceiling. Already there’s talk of him being in the mix for players like Wagner, Clark, etc. - not so much for Willard. Maryland fans would ABSOLUTELY rather have KP - to suggest otherwise is delusional.
As I said, time will tell in both situations.
Who knew Willard’s wife posts on this board?You don't know what I meant with applaud? You used that exact word and I was mocking it. Now do you know what it means?
I just took umbrage at you saying Maryland was burning money with the hiring of Willard. You're wrong!
You answered your own question in your first 2 1/2 sentences…Not a P5 because why? They don't have a FB team? Or is it money related, or number of sports in their program?
Or just thought less of by the media or by you BP? Which one is it?
The 3 key words in that sentence is “at Seton Hall”. Who else has been successful there? He’s a good coach. We’ll see if the resources at Maryland are a factor. Is he worse than Mark Turgeon?
Okay I'm going to admit that I thought the power 5 conference was a media created term? That it was mostly associated with football and the BCS championship?You answered your own question in your first 2 1/2 sentences…
I thought mocking each other was ok?Typical response.
Again - and hopefully for the last time - by the use of the term P5 with basketball - I’m primarily differentiating the size and budget of those schools (like Maryland) vs those schools (like Seton Hall) that are not included in the P5 cash bonanza.Okay I'm going to admit that I thought the power 5 conference was a media created term? That it was mostly associated with football and the BCS championship?
When it came to basketball I don't recall the power 5 being relevant at all. There's no BCS to determine a champion there's a tournament. Villanova has been as successful as any conference program in the last 10 years out of the Big East conference. Uconn did the same the 10 years before that.
Nowhere do I see anyone saying The Big East is not a power conference. No one compares them to C-USA or even Gonzaga's conference. It's not considered a mid-major like the MAC or the Sun Belt conference.
But I digress, Maryland is so above the likes of a former Big East coach. What are they thinking?
But you intentionally failed to answer mine. So you say....you have no answer.You answered your own question in your first 2 1/2 sentences…
That’s because It’s after the fact. Turgeon was at least on a lot of teams radar when he got hired at Maryland.None of that is a ringing endorsement, which supports my opinion that it’s an uninspiring hire. The new marketing campaign of “at least he’s better than Turgeon” might not sell tickets.
Btw…PJ Carlisemo did have Seton Hall a missed free throw away from winning a national championship.
Do you have an answer for my question?However you want to end this conversation is fine with me. I disagree with you about Willard but not enough to cause a clash of Cards fans.
It has been very informative sparring with you.
You’re kidding - right? Not only did you answer your own questions in your post - they were also answered in more depth in several posts in this thread.But you intentionally failed to answer mine. So you say....you have no answer.