Some of our fans have questioned the logic of Petrino trying to adapt his offense. Specifically, Petrino adding a dual threat QB to his traditional offense.
Since Saturday's LPT debacle and after viewing mobile QBs run all over them this year, LPT fans have asked why they don't add a dual threat QB to their offense. I'm now listening to a podcast of a Lexington sports talk show from Tuesday nite where the host referred to the "offense of the future", what Petrino is trying to do and the offense that other successful schools are running.
Now, I'm the last guy to embrace what any LPT fan thinks about football, and these people may be dead wrong. They were obviously trashed by that very offense all year long and may have a distorted POV. LPT fans also know firsthand how successful Petrino was here a decade ago and how they were dominated by the offense he ran at that time. Yet, they look somewhat enviously at the offense they saw on Saturday...
Since Saturday's LPT debacle and after viewing mobile QBs run all over them this year, LPT fans have asked why they don't add a dual threat QB to their offense. I'm now listening to a podcast of a Lexington sports talk show from Tuesday nite where the host referred to the "offense of the future", what Petrino is trying to do and the offense that other successful schools are running.
Now, I'm the last guy to embrace what any LPT fan thinks about football, and these people may be dead wrong. They were obviously trashed by that very offense all year long and may have a distorted POV. LPT fans also know firsthand how successful Petrino was here a decade ago and how they were dominated by the offense he ran at that time. Yet, they look somewhat enviously at the offense they saw on Saturday...