The guy again shows what a class act he is. grissom and postel look quite small in comparison - employment status be damned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just don't understand why they just didn't give him the, $3M w/o cause buyout, implemented because of a new President, and save the University all of the bad publicity, attorney fees and the UofL Family division. This could be a real damaging dumpster fire for awhile.
Had the Cardinal on the sleeve too.Him wearing a shirt with the ACC logo on it a coincidence? I think not. Loved it.
Other ADs would’ve canned pitino out of fear for possibly losing their own job. College athletics is rife with people in high positions covering their asses by throwing those below them under the bus.Not hating but trying to find perspective. One thing that puzzles me about what Jurich has contended through all this. It really sounds as if he is saying that he needed to be told to fire Pitino or even simply reprimand or question the guy. I wonder how many other AD’s (people in charge of athletic departments) would have been tolerant of what supposedly CRP did. Maybe not fired, but placed on administrative leave. Something? Also wouldn’t you think that he would have placed his love for the University over all the negativity that CRP brought on the program. I don’t buy that TJ didn’t have that authority when in other issues he answered to no one but the President. Was he directed by the President to fire Coach Crum or was it his decision that U of L needed a change?
Other ADs would’ve canned pitino out of fear for possibly losing their own job. College athletics is rife with people in high positions covering their asses by throwing those below them under the bus.
Obviously, that’s not the way Jurich operates. Another differentiator between he and that sniveling weasel greg postel.
A reasonable alternative would be to investigate first, then act.I just don’t see how anyone could see any reasonable alternative to firing Pitino and firing him swiftly.
His assistant coach is on tape basically agreeing to funnel money to a kid or his parents. I don't know isn't good enough when your program is on probation. Jurich even admits he knew the administration wanted Pitinio gone back in July. Then this occurs he doesn't act quickly and decisively. He either thought he was untouchable or he wanted this to be the result.
I am not questioning the need for pitino to be fired but, what’s the rush? Please tell me his firing him prior to investigating the situation has helped the situation? Whether you fire someone today or next week - they’re just as fired.I just don’t see how anyone could see any reasonable alternative to firing Pitino and firing him swiftly.
Given the opportunity to fire Fair, there’s no question that Jurich would have. The reality is that he never got the opportunity to review the situation - which is what a rational person does - and then act.His assistant coach is on tape basically agreeing to funnel money to a kid or his parents. I don't know isn't good enough when your program is on probation. Jurich even admits he knew the administration wanted Pitinio gone back in July. Then this occurs he doesn't act quickly and decisively. He either thought he was untouchable or he wanted this to be the result.
I think the timing was they didn’t want to let CRP start the season and possibly be fired mid season and be left with a season in disarray. This way they had a new coach to begin the season.I am not questioning the need for pitino to be fired but, what’s the rush? Please tell me his firing him prior to investigating the situation has helped the situation? Whether you fire someone today or next week - they’re just as fired.
No other head coach has been fired as of yet. We self imposed a tournament ban which was a mistake. Why does the university consistently impose penalties on itself that probably aren’t coming?
Not hating but trying to find perspective. One thing that puzzles me about what Jurich has contended through all this. It really sounds as if he is saying that he needed to be told to fire Pitino or even simply reprimand or question the guy. I wonder how many other AD’s (people in charge of athletic departments) would have been tolerant of what supposedly CRP did. Maybe not fired, but placed on administrative leave. Something? Also wouldn’t you think that he would have placed his love for the University over all the negativity that CRP brought on the program. I don’t buy that TJ didn’t have that authority when in other issues he answered to no one but the President. Was he directed by the President to fire Coach Crum or was it his decision that U of L needed a change?
Given the opportunity to fire Fair, there’s no question that Jurich would have. The reality is that he never got the opportunity to review the situation - which is what a rational person does - and then act.His assistant coach is on tape basically agreeing to funnel money to a kid or his parents. I don't know isn't good enough when your program is on probation. Jurich even admits he knew the administration wanted Pitinio gone back in July. Then this occurs he doesn't act quickly and decisively. He either thought he was untouchable or he wanted this to be the result.
Got to agree with Ghost on this one. Jurich made UofL into a ACC powerhouse athletic program, and he did it his way. He was loyal to his coaches and fair. Had he been given the chance to, it's my humble opinion that after all the facts were discovered and digested, he would have fired Rick Pitino. He never got that chance because he stood on his own principles not to make any decision without having all the facts. It's clear to me that the new BOT has its own narrative and that is to destroy UofL's athletic department. We're in for some very lean years as UofL fans IMO. Maybe for the remainder of my lifetime. That sucks.
I get that but, either way - it’s a new coach next year. They coulda let pitino coach this team this year and then made a decision. Might’ve kept a recruit or two in the process.I think the timing was they didn’t want to let CRP start the season and possibly be fired mid season and be left with a season in disarray. This way they had a new coach to begin the season.
He never got the chance. According to Jurich and if you follow Postel Jurich was never given any details. So if your not given the details what’s he suppose to fire him for. Jurich probably had a better understanding of Pitino’s contract. Had they taken a breath and let Jurich handle it I’m betting it would have cost UofL a lot less money than it’s going too. As it is, it’s a HR nightmare, because Postel and that nitwit Grissom screwed the whole Pitino thing and he’s probably going to get a big payday. But they’ll never admit that.
Lotta Monday morning quarterbacking in that post.The fact that Pitino had such a forgiving contract (with the huge buyout and the 10 day notice BS) in light of the probation is part of the problem. After the Powell scandal how the hell was Pitino’s contract not revisited? I’ll tell you why - because this is the same AD that extended his contract not long after the Sypher situation came to light. He was too lenient with Pitino, essentially turning a blind eye to negative situations.
Lotta Monday morning quarterbacking in that post.
Personally I thought the way Jurich handled the Sypher debacle took a lot of courage on his part. I didn't really agree with it, but it is another example of how he always gathered all the facts before making a decision. In the end, Pitino was exonerated because he had a moment of weakness and was taken advantage of by a gold digger looking for a payday. Not defending Pitino because he should have known better, but it does show that Jurich was more than just his boss. He was also a friend who could be counted on to be compassionate. That's pretty rare today.The fact that Pitino had such a forgiving contract (with the huge buyout and the 10 day notice BS) in light of the probation is part of the problem. After the Powell scandal how the hell was Pitino’s contract not revisited? I’ll tell you why - because this is the same AD that extended his contract not long after the Sypher situation came to light. He was too lenient with Pitino, essentially turning a blind eye to negative situations.
Personally I thought the way Jurich handled the Sypher debacle took a lot of courage on his part. I didn't really agree with it, but it is another example of how he always gathered all the facts before making a decision. In the end, Pitino was exonerated because he had a moment of weakness and was taken advantage of by a gold digger looking for a payday. Not defending Pitino because he should have known better, but it does show that Jurich was more than just his boss. He was also a friend who could be counted on to be compassionate. That's pretty rare today.
You can disagree with that method of operating but, it was consistently the way that Jurich operated. As he said - he hired them and rather than say “sink or swim” he supported them. He wanted them to succeed and went at it from that perspective - rather than set stipulations that really would only be put there to cover his own ass.Agree, although I think it speaks to a pattern of Jurich not holding Pitino accountable or putting stipulations on his employment
His assistant coach is on tape basically agreeing to funnel money to a kid or his parents. I don't know isn't good enough when your program is on probation. Jurich even admits he knew the administration wanted Pitinio gone back in July. Then this occurs he doesn't act quickly and decisively. He either thought he was untouchable or he wanted this to be the result.
Sources on where Jurich “bucked his boss”?Agree, in the real world buck your boss and you either get fires or promoted. Jurich got fired. End of store!
He never got the chance. According to Jurich and if you follow Postel Jurich was never given any details. So if your not given the details what’s he suppose to fire him for. Jurich probably had a better understanding of Pitino’s contract. Had they taken a breath and let Jurich handle it I’m betting it would have cost UofL a lot less money than it’s going too. As it is, it’s a HR nightmare, because Postel and that nitwit Grissom screwed the whole Pitino thing and he’s probably going to get a big payday. But they’ll never admit that.
The fact that Pitino had such a forgiving contract (with the huge buyout and the 10 day notice BS) in light of the probation is part of the problem. After the Powell scandal how the hell was Pitino’s contract not revisited? I’ll tell you why - because this is the same AD that extended his contract not long after the Sypher situation came to light. He was too lenient with Pitino, essentially turning a blind eye to negative situations.
His assistant coach is on tape basically agreeing to funnel money to a kid or his parents. I don't know isn't good enough when your program is on probation. Jurich even admits he knew the administration wanted Pitinio gone back in July. Then this occurs he doesn't act quickly and decisively. He either thought he was untouchable or he wanted this to be the result.
Agree, in the real world buck your boss and you either get fires or promoted. Jurich got fired. End of store!
Just from what I have read posted, Tom Jurich was hired under former President Ramsey and given free reign to operate the athletics department and build it up as far as possible.
Every manager or executive has their own style to reach that objective. Blue glasses would have to cover blind eyes to think he was anything but wildly successful.
However , eventually the person that was Jurichs supervisor was dismissed for reasons that boiled down to financial irresponsibility. The new supervisor(s): Postel and Grissom,
Had a different idea .... especially Mr Grissom. Their business model was more based on the athletic department being totally subordinate to the University as a whole.
So you have a man that was amazingly successful being told he had to heel. If he was ever specifically told that.
Personalities always come into play. Successful managers usually do manage to rub people the wrong way. Did Tom Jurich make mistakes? Sure he did. We all do. Was there truly 'cause' for him to be fired? All the information a fan base gets is slanted one way or another.
No quick easy answer for that. No one really 'knows' what information the BOT had behind closed doors. For whatever reasons there truly are, the decision was 10-3 to terminate.
The lawyers will toss it around to see who was right and who was wrong.
Just from what I have read posted, Tom Jurich was hired under former President Ramsey and given free reign to operate the athletics department and build it up as far as possible.
Every manager or executive has their own style to reach that objective. Blue glasses would have to cover blind eyes to think he was anything but wildly successful.
However , eventually the person that was Jurichs supervisor was dismissed for reasons that boiled down to financial irresponsibility. The new supervisor(s): Postel and Grissom,
Had a different idea .... especially Mr Grissom. Their business model was more based on the athletic department being totally subordinate to the University as a whole.
So you have a man that was amazingly successful being told he had to heel. If he was ever specifically told that.
Personalities always come into play. Successful managers usually do manage to rub people the wrong way. Did Tom Jurich make mistakes? Sure he did. We all do. Was there truly 'cause' for him to be fired? All the information a fan base gets is slanted one way or another.
No quick easy answer for that. No one really 'knows' what information the BOT had behind closed doors. For whatever reasons there truly are, the decision was 10-3 to terminate.
The lawyers will toss it around to see who was right and who was wrong.
Well you have to also consider that we were still involved in the appeals process and letting CRP continue to coach was just not an option if you want the NCAA to believe that you are trying to make things right not just hang on to a HOF coach.I get that but, either way - it’s a new coach next year. They coulda let pitino coach this team this year and then made a decision. Might’ve kept a recruit or two in the process.
Just didn’t fit with the preconceived plan of grissom and his lackeys.
What’s this “NCAA” that you speak of?Well you have to also consider that we were still involved in the appeals process and letting CRP continue to coach was just not an option if you want the NCAA to believe that you are trying to make things right not just hang on to a HOF coach.
If Jurich had plenty of evidence to fire a HOF coach like Crum for complacency, 61-61 his last 4 seasons, 0-2 in NCAA and two minor sanctions in the 90’s but no direct violation of Crum, he certainly had enough writing on the wall to dismiss CRP or simply a reprimand. The difference, which shouldn’t be the most important factor is that CRP was winning and Crum was not. The most important factor should have been that young adults were being subject to prostitution and other moral issues. I understand being L1C4 but I just don’t see how you can overlook or justify that.Yes, it is hard to come to a verdict, when you are not privileged to all the facts.
If Jurich had plenty of evidence to fire a HOF coach like Crum for complacency, 61-61 his last 4 seasons, 0-2 in NCAA and two minor sanctions in the 90’s but no direct violation of Crum, he certainly had enough writing on the wall to dismiss CRP or simply a reprimand. The difference, which shouldn’t be the most important factor is that CRP was winning and Crum was not. The most important factor should have been that young adults were being subject to prostitution and other moral issues. I understand being L1C4 but I just don’t see how you can overlook or justify that.