ADVERTISEMENT

Georgia, Alabama and Arkansas...

Jun 24, 2009
494
236
6
I'm going to repeat that again, Georgia, Alabama and Arkansas. UK's pathetic road to an SEC title. In front of a partisan UK crowd since the tournament is essentially the UK invitational being in Nashville. Not one ranked team and only Arkansas will even make the tournament. And you UK fans expect us to be impressed by that?

It's pathetic that UK is being rewarded for such a pathetic schedule, their seed should be dropping right now, not rising. They absolutely should be a 3 seed at best, but once again their schedule against glorified YMCA opponents will allow them to be over seeded.

That's what you UK fans don't understand, we don't care if you want to play nobodies all year long, but you should be punished for that, not rewarded. Playing against SEC teams allows you all to rack up the win totals and put up gaudy statistics, which essentially guarantees you to make the NCAA and allows you to be over seeded.

You UK fans for years cried about UofL football only having 2 or 3 tough games a year and how we had so much time to prepare for each game. Yet you don't apply the same standard to your UK basketball team who has about 5 - 6 Super Bowls each year in basketball while the rest of the year you can play your B or C game and still win. Of course what's amazing is that this year you are 2 - 4 in your Super Bowls, with 2 of those wins being against UNC without one of their best players and UF without one of their best players.

You want respect, move to a real basketball conference. All time wins my a$$, you wouldn't be if you played in a real basketball conference.
 
SEC basketball

1400x1400_10970003.jpg
 
And you know what, screw it, I'll so irritated with this stupid UK talk I'll go ahead and put out a ban bet to any UK fan on this board.

No SEC team outside of UK will make it past the first weekend. Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina and Vanderbilt will all be gone the first weekend, in fact most I believe will be gone the first round. SEC teams won't know what to do when other real basketball teams smack them in the mouth with real basketball.UK could be gone first weekend as well but UK is the only one with a legitimate chance to make it past the first weekend.

You UK fans act like the SEC isn't as bad as we think it is, put your money where your mouth is. I'm so confident that even if one of those 4 SEC (Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina or Vanderbilt) make it past the first weekend into the Sweet 16, you can ban me for 6 months. If they all fall in the first weekend like I know they will, then you are banned for 6 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deeva
Okay, but why be so consumed by it?
Duke has 8 losses, but they are going to be rewarded for their strong SOS, UK is being penalized because they aren't in a tough league like the ACC.
What else do you want?
If UK was in the ACC, they would have their fair share of quality wins and losses that wouldn't be considered bad.
So what else do you want? At least UK didn't lose to those 3 teams. You would have a point if UK lost, but they didn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohiodon
And you know what, screw it, I'll so irritated with this stupid UK talk I'll go ahead and put out a ban bet to any UK fan on this board.

No SEC team outside of UK will make it past the first weekend. Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina and Vanderbilt will all be gone the first weekend, in fact most I believe will be gone the first round. SEC teams won't know what to do when other real basketball teams smack them in the mouth with real basketball.UK could be gone first weekend as well but UK is the only one with a legitimate chance to make it past the first weekend.

You UK fans act like the SEC isn't as bad as we think it is, put your money where your mouth is. I'm so confident that even if one of those 4 SEC (Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina or Vanderbilt) make it past the first weekend into the Sweet 16, you can ban me for 6 months. If they all fall in the first weekend like I know they will, then you are banned for 6 months.
You need to be more concerned about your team than Kentucky. BTW, who are we kidding here, you would love to belong to the SEC. I'm not a basher but you all sometimes go off the deep end. I hate to break the news to most of you but it is your state university.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohiodon
Earlier in the season when that team was losing, they barely commented. Now that they are smelling themselves, the infestation has started. I hope the extermination starts very soon!
 
Last edited:
You need to be more concerned about your team than Kentucky. BTW, who are we kidding here, you would love to belong to the SEC. I'm not a basher but you all sometimes go off the deep end. I hate to break the news to most of you but it is your state university.
Dude...as long as you worry about your world beaters...what does it matter?!? Who are you kidding?!?
 
Uh I wasn't going to post BUT I think UK beat UL in Football this year!!

Yeah I guess a blind squirrel finds an acorn every now and then. That one win was after 5 straight for us if I remember correctly. I guess I'll take 5 out of 6 every time!

Let me know when UK football beats Florida or when UK football wins even a somewhat major bowl game, never mind a New Year's 6 bowl game like we have twice this century.
 
You need to be more concerned about your team than Kentucky. BTW, who are we kidding here, you would love to belong to the SEC. I'm not a basher but you all sometimes go off the deep end. I hate to break the news to most of you but it is your state university.
Not!! UofL is my state university. I went there, I have family there. I've never considered UK my state university, only my state enemy. And there isn't a Cards fan who would rather be in the SEC than the ACC. You can be big brother all you want. The fact is this UK team has still only beaten 3 ranked teams and one of those is a Michigan State team who hasn't been ranked since November.
 
Agree with TheRealVille, screw you UK fans. UK is A state university, just like UofL, WKU, EKU, NKU, Murray and Morehead. Just because you have Kentucky in your name does not mean you are any better.

That is part of the arrogance so many of us hate about you all. It's not about your success in basketball or your lack of success in every other sport, it's about the fact that you all feel entitled to being #1 in the state just because you have Kentucky in your name, not earning it. You feel entitled to being unchallenged in the state and hate us because we have not only challenged you, we have passed you in every sport outside of men's college basketball (well, I guess riffle too, that fits right in with UK and your redneck fanbase). And even in men's college basketball we are largely equal to you and have the more recent National Title.

As TheRealVille said, I have one state university, and my state university is the University of Louisville. My only regret is that the city of Louisville and UofL can't join the state of Indiana. When I tell people where I'm from, I say it simply, I'm from Louisville. Luckily when I come back to visit I can fly right into Louisville, I don't have to worry about acknowledging the rest of the state's existence.
 
Noticed that no UK fans have taken me up on my offer. You all think the SEC is better than we are giving them credit for, put your money where your mouth is. If any SEC team outside UK (Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina, Vanderbilt) gets past the first weekend I'll take being banned for 6 months. If no SEC team outside of UK makes it out of the first weekend then you are banned for 6 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zipp
I know I am going to get hammered immediately because I am a "sUcKs fan", but I would request an intellectual debate about SOS from an analytical perspective. I cheer for UofL when they aren't playing UK. I'm a Murray State grad and received my MBA from UK, so I have always supported basketball in this state.

I'm not dumb. The ACC is way tougher than the SEC and its not close. UofL played a tougher schedule than Kentucky and its not up for debate. But....put aside you bias and anger/rage towards anything UK/SEC related and look at FACTS and unbiased numbers.

KenPOM and BPI both had Kentucky's SOS in the top 30.

Kentucky went 8-4 against the RPI top 50 and UofL went 7-8 against the top 50. So, you all only played 3 more games against tougher teams. Kentucky does have a bad loss at UT, who wasn't an awful team(took UNC to the last second on the road).

UK did not go through the gauntlet of the ACC yes, but we did get a small sample size. Played UNC on a neutral site and then UofL on the road in back to back games. Beat UNC on a neutral site(I know you'll say "miracle performance by Monk" while ignoring Justin Jackson's career day") and then went on the road for the first time a few days later and lost by 1 possession on the road to UofL. Both of those teams are probably the best 2 teams from the ACC and are 1 and 2 seeds.

So a schedule of UNC, UofL, UCLA, Kansas, and Florida twice(analytics have them as a top 10 team and they are a 4 seed.) Other than Florida, those are teams UK scheduled because they cannot control who is in their conference.

But, the Big East/B1G had 7, Big 12 had 6 bids, SEC had 5, and Pac 12 had 4 as far as bids go. The SEC is not a top conference, but it is formidable. I know some of you only watch "the big games", but there really are bad conferences. I watched Murray State run though the OVC several years and when they run into an average power conference team, they are way over matched. The SEC is not the ACC, but there is a bigger gap between the SEC and say the OVC/MEAC/MVC.

Going 16-2 in a power conference is pretty impressive, it is harder to do against a conference like the ACC yes..but there are talented/athletic teams who are just average teams that can have a good night. Heck, last year the Warriors were the best team in league history and the Lakers were historically bad...but on 1 given night the Lakers won the game. Basketball is very random, and on any given night 18-22 year old kids can have off nights.

In 2014, you all may have had the best team in the nation and you still only went 15-3 against a bad AAC conference. In 2014, UK was the 2 seed against a down SEC. UCONN wasn't a world beater against a down AAC as well. In that year, UK and Florida both made the Final 4 and UCONN won the title. Both the SEC and AAC only had 3 bids a piece that year, but did that matter? Both conferences did not have 10 bids, but at the end of the day the talent was high level D1 competition and was good enough to prepare everyone for the tournament.

Computers, opinions, conferences, and etc. don't matter at the end of the day. Go out and win it on the court. I would love to see both UK and UofL win every game until they meet! I'll cheer for my school if they meet, but I'm not childish and get angry/hold grudges against players/coaches/fans because of something like a game of basketball. My Uncle served in Vietnam and always reminds me of bigger issues. Good luck to the Cards, if you want to engage in some childish trash talk and ignore me because I'm a UK fan go ahead! It's March and I am about to enjoy the best event in the world, the NCAA tournament!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwcat and ohiodon
HoptownCat a thoughtful post but very hypocritical. Every argument you just made for UK and the SEC could've been made all those years for UofL and the Big East in football.

Yet did you apply this standard then? No. You UK fans led the charge saying that UofL only won in football because we only had to show up for 2 or 3 games a year. You all said the Big East champion had no business even being in a BCS (now New Year's 6) bowl game. Never mind the fact that the Big East more than held its own in those BCS games against the other conferences (including wins over Florida and Georgia of your mighty SEC). You all always said our program was a sham and that we should be given no credit for winning the Big East.

Yet when the SEC in basketball is significantly worse than the Big East was in football you want us to overlook that? Does that not come off as a little hypocritical? That's my issue, maybe I would be more forgiving of UK and the SEC in basketball if it wasn't for the entire UK fanbase trying to diminish our football accomplishments while in the Big East (many of your UK fans still believe Florida was "disinterested" which even Florida players debunked). But you all tried like heck to diminish every accomplishment we've ever had in football, so don't expect me to give UK and the SEC any slack in basketball.

And BTW the SEC wishes it had a year like the AAC had in 2014. The AAC in 2014 was by no means even close to the best conference but it was still better than anything the SEC has put out as a conference in basketball in recent memory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KerryRhodes
HoptownCat a thoughtful post but very hypocritical. Every argument you just made for UK and the SEC could've been made all those years for UofL and the Big East in football.

Yet did you apply this standard then? No. You UK fans led the charge saying that UofL only won in football because we only had to show up for 2 or 3 games a year. You all said the Big East champion had no business even being in a BCS (now New Year's 6) bowl game. Never mind the fact that the Big East more than held its own in those BCS games against the other conferences (including wins over Florida and Georgia of your mighty SEC). You all always said our program was a sham and that we should be given no credit for winning the Big East.

Yet when the SEC in basketball is significantly worse than the Big East was in football you want us to overlook that? Does that not come off as a little hypocritical? That's my issue, maybe I would be more forgiving of UK and the SEC in basketball if it wasn't for the entire UK fanbase trying to diminish our football accomplishments while in the Big East. But you all tried like heck to diminish every accomplishment we've ever had in football, so don't expect me to give UK and the SEC any slack in basketball.

And BTW the SEC wishes it had a year like the AAC had in 2014. The AAC in 2014 was by no means even close to the best conference but it was still better than anything the SEC has put out as a conference in basketball in recent memory.

2 SEC teams made the final 4 in 2014.
 
2 SEC teams made the final 4 in 2014.

And which conference was home to the National Champion that year? Oh that's right, the AAC. And UK was lucky that the Harrison twins went on a tear. UofL beats UK in the Sweet 16 7 out of 10 times and that was just one of the 3. It was very close to an all AAC National Championship that year.

Bill get back to me when an SEC team not named UK or UF gets to the Final 4. Hasn't happened since 2006 and before that 1996 and I have a feeling I'll be waiting awhile before it happens again.
 
And which conference was home to the National Champion that year? Oh that's right, the AAC. And UK was lucky that the Harrison twins went on a tear. UofL beats UK in the Sweet 16 7 out of 10 times and that was just one of the 3. It was very close to an all AAC National Championship that year.

Bill get back to me when an SEC team not named UK or UF gets to the Final 4. Hasn't happened since 2006 and before that 1996 and I have a feeling I'll be waiting awhile before it happens again.

UK beat Louisville twice that year, so I'm not sure how you figure UofL would beat UK 7 out of 10 times. It was much closer to being an all SEC final that year, since 2 teans reached the final 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohiodon and kyjeff1
Hmmm lets see the first game was at Rupp Arena with the typical corrupt refs. In case you forgot we dominated the tournament game for 36 minutes before you all started going off and throwing in crazy shots. That is still a painful loss for me as we had you so outclassed and threw it away the end. 4 minutes IMO to this day cost us the 2014 National Championship.

I'm not saying overall, I'm saying in a tournament atmosphere UofL beats UK that year 7 out of 10. We were the better team but UK hit some crazy shots at the end. That's how the NCAA works, the best team doesn't always win. You all should know that from 2015.
 
At least I can speak coherently and understand grammar and basic sentence structure, unlike the majority of your fellow UK fans JohnKBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnKBA
Hmmm lets see the first game was at Rupp Arena with the typical corrupt refs. In case you forgot we dominated the tournament game for 36 minutes before you all started going off and throwing in crazy shots. That is still a painful loss for me as we had you so outclassed and threw it away the end. 4 minutes IMO to this day cost us the 2014 National Championship.

I'm not saying overall, I'm saying in a tournament atmosphere UofL beats UK that year 7 out of 10. We were the better team but UK hit some crazy shots at the end. That's how the NCAA works, the best team doesn't always win. You all should know that from 2015.

Louisville had every oppurtunity to win that game for sure, Cauley-Stein getting injured in the first half, and Young fouled out 6 minutes or so into the second half.

Tennessee also got within an eyelash of the elite 8 in 2014.
 
Maybe Young fouled out because he committed too many fouls? Again this is the thing about you UK fans, you act like UK players never commit a foul. I've never seen a fan base boo after every call against their team like UK fans do. It's always the refs screwing your players right? Young deserved to foul out in that game.

And the Tennessee thing shows your desperation, I never said UK and UF weren't good, but the rest of the SEC is pathetic and you trying to put lip stick on a pig is pathetic. Virginia and Notre Dame have gotten a lot closer to a Final Four recently than Tennessee, doesn't mean they got it. Get back to me when Tennessee or some SEC team not named UK or UF gets to a Final Four this decade.
 
Maybe Young fouled out because he committed too many fouls? Again this is the thing about you UK fans, you act like UK players never commit a foul. I've never seen a fan base boo after every call against their team like UK fans do. It's always the refs screwing your players right? Young deserved to foul out in that game.

And the Tennessee thing shows your desperation, I never said UK and UF weren't good, but the rest of the SEC is pathetic and you trying to put lip stick on a pig is pathetic. Virginia and Notre Dame have gotten a lot closer to a Final Four recently than Tennessee, doesn't mean they got it. Get back to me when Tennessee or some SEC team not named UK or UF gets to a Final Four this decade.

You picked 2014 to use as the example, not me. I'd say the SEC had a pretty good year in relation to the AAC that year.

So Louisville got jobbed in Rupp Arena that year by the refs, and in the next breath you say UK fans constantly whine about refs? All fans complain about reffing it's not unique to UK.

Good luck in the tourney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwcat and ohiodon
You picked 2014 to use as the example, not me. I'd say the SEC had a pretty good year in relation to the AAC that year.

So Louisville got jobbed in Rupp Arena that year by the refs, and in the next breath you say UK fans constantly whine about refs? All fans complain about reffing it's not unique to UK.

Good luck in the tourney.

Because UK does get a lot of calls by the refs at Rupp, they don't call it corrupt arena for nothing. There has been statistical evidence done about the home cooking UK gets at Rupp.

But whether you see it or not there is a difference. I don't believe that UofL never commits a foul and most UofL fans are the same way. We might boo and complain about some calls but we also understand that a lot of calls are good. UK fans take the booing and complaining to another level, watch a game at Rupp without the blue tinted glasses, your fellow UK fans literally boo every single call. A UK player can level a player from an opposing team and the UK fans will boo if the refs calls a foul on the UK player.

Yes all fans complain about reffing but not every single call like UK does. That is unique to UK.
 
Hmmm lets see the first game was at Rupp Arena with the typical corrupt refs. In case you forgot we dominated the tournament game for 36 minutes before you all started going off and throwing in crazy shots. That is still a painful loss for me as we had you so outclassed and threw it away the end. 4 minutes IMO to this day cost us the 2014 National Championship.

I'm not saying overall, I'm saying in a tournament atmosphere UofL beats UK that year 7 out of 10. We were the better team but UK hit some crazy shots at the end. That's how the NCAA works, the best team doesn't always win. You all should know that from 2015.
UK hit crazy shots, but UL missed a bunch of free throws too.
It happens.
It's no different than uk losing by 3 at the Yum in December, UK made some mistakes that cost them that game, but we aren't harping on it, UK lost, the team with the most points at the end is the winner. Playing the WHAT IF game is meh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwcat
HoptownCat a thoughtful post but very hypocritical. Every argument you just made for UK and the SEC could've been made all those years for UofL and the Big East in football.

Yet did you apply this standard then? No. You UK fans led the charge saying that UofL only won in football because we only had to show up for 2 or 3 games a year. You all said the Big East champion had no business even being in a BCS (now New Year's 6) bowl game. Never mind the fact that the Big East more than held its own in those BCS games against the other conferences (including wins over Florida and Georgia of your mighty SEC). You all always said our program was a sham and that we should be given no credit for winning the Big East.

Yet when the SEC in basketball is significantly worse than the Big East was in football you want us to overlook that? Does that not come off as a little hypocritical? That's my issue, maybe I would be more forgiving of UK and the SEC in basketball if it wasn't for the entire UK fanbase trying to diminish our football accomplishments while in the Big East (many of your UK fans still believe Florida was "disinterested" which even Florida players debunked). But you all tried like heck to diminish every accomplishment we've ever had in football, so don't expect me to give UK and the SEC any slack in basketball.

And BTW the SEC wishes it had a year like the AAC had in 2014. The AAC in 2014 was by no means even close to the best conference but it was still better than anything the SEC has put out as a conference in basketball in recent memory.
#1 All the years UofL was in the Big East in football, I do not recall any of those years where the Big East had a team in the BCS title game or even a team capable of winning a title. The SEC has had the #1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament 3 out of the last 6 seasons and 3 champions in the last 11 years. (Big10 has not had a champion since 2000 I believe, huge drought)

Also, my fellow UK football fans tend to use the SEC is tough argument to compensate for the fact that UK is awful and that's all they have to beat their chest about (I do not do that by the way) I don't think UofL basketball is a program like UK football where all they can argue about is how tough their conference is, UofL has succeeded nationally in weak and tougher conferences. Heck, weren't you all a Metro Conference team during your 80's run, strength of conference did not matter then because you all still did well anyways.

#2 The SEC wishes it had a year like the 2014 AAC, you mean like 2012. Your whole basis for that point is that because they won a title and the SEC never had a season like that...ignoring the fact that the SEC had a championship in 2012 and 2 out of 4 teams in the 2014 final 4.

The SEC has had 3 champions since the year 2000(Actually 3 since 2006), The ACC has had 6, the Big East(new/old) has had 5 titles(new Big East just 1), AAC 1 title, Big 12 1 title, and the Big 10 has not won a title since the 2000 Michigan State Spartans. And I used numbers for their conference at the time not current conference. Quit acting like the SEC is a mid major this year. Yes, it has been a weaker conference of the Power 5 as of lately...but 3 champions in 11 seasons(and a runner-up in there as well) is not a mid-major conference like an OVC. Not on the ACC's level...but not a bottom tier.

Beating your chest about your conference is on the level of UK football fans, is that really what you want your program to emulate? Considering you all are a powerhouse almost blue-blood level program, I'd think not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwcat
Noticed that no UK fans have taken me up on my offer. You all think the SEC is better than we are giving them credit for, put your money where your mouth is. If any SEC team outside UK (Florida, Arkansas, South Carolina, Vanderbilt) gets past the first weekend I'll take being banned for 6 months. If no SEC team outside of UK makes it out of the first weekend then you are banned for 6 months.
Nobody is saying the SEC is great or even good, but jeez, it's not as bad as you guys think it is.
Also, take a look at what UL and Notre Dame have done since getting into the ACC, those two schools are extremely competitive in that league, heck, ND has won the ACC title twice (I think). But UK would suck if they were in the SEC??? Okay.
Again. Nobody is saying the SEC is a great basketball conference, but it is clearly improving.
 
#1 All the years UofL was in the Big East in football, I do not recall any of those years where the Big East had a team in the BCS title game or even a team capable of winning a title. The SEC has had the #1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament 3 out of the last 6 seasons and 3 champions in the last 11 years. (Big10 has not had a champion since 2000 I believe, huge drought)

Also, my fellow UK football fans tend to use the SEC is tough argument to compensate for the fact that UK is awful and that's all they have to beat their chest about (I do not do that by the way) I don't think UofL basketball is a program like UK football where all they can argue about is how tough their conference is, UofL has succeeded nationally in weak and tougher conferences. Heck, weren't you all a Metro Conference team during your 80's run, strength of conference did not matter then because you all still did well anyways.

#2 The SEC wishes it had a year like the 2014 AAC, you mean like 2012. Your whole basis for that point is that because they won a title and the SEC never had a season like that...ignoring the fact that the SEC had a championship in 2012 and 2 out of 4 teams in the 2014 final 4.

The SEC has had 3 champions since the year 2000(Actually 3 since 2006), The ACC has had 6, the Big East(new/old) has had 5 titles(new Big East just 1), AAC 1 title, Big 12 1 title, and the Big 10 has not won a title since the 2000 Michigan State Spartans. And I used numbers for their conference at the time not current conference. Quit acting like the SEC is a mid major this year. Yes, it has been a weaker conference of the Power 5 as of lately...but 3 champions in 11 seasons(and a runner-up in there as well) is not a mid-major conference like an OVC. Not on the ACC's level...but not a bottom tier.

Beating your chest about your conference is on the level of UK football fans, is that really what you want your program to emulate? Considering you all are a powerhouse almost blue-blood level program, I'd think not.


Miami did pretty good in the BCS coming out of the Big East.
 
Miami did pretty good in the BCS coming out of the Big East.
Miami was never in the Big East while Louisville was in the conference. Louisville joined the Big East after Miami, Virginia Tech, and BC all moved to the ACC, which were probably the 3 top programs in the conference at the time.

It is amazing how things have changed in a relatively short time frame over the last 10-15 years. Who would've thought UofL would be an ACC school and WKU would move to up to FBS in the Conference USA. Now I just need my Racers to move to the Missouri Valley(I can dream right). Jurich and the UofL admin have probably done the best job of any power conference team in building their departments up top to bottom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwcat
#1 All the years UofL was in the Big East in football, I do not recall any of those years where the Big East had a team in the BCS title game or even a team capable of winning a title. The SEC has had the #1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament 3 out of the last 6 seasons and 3 champions in the last 11 years. (Big10 has not had a champion since 2000 I believe, huge drought)

UofL in 2006 ring a bell? We were one field goal away from going to the BCS title game. And I can tell you this Hoptown, while we may not have beaten Florida that year we sure would've given Florida a better game than Ohio State did. That I am sure of.

Nevermind WVU in 2007, they don't blow it against Pittsburgh they are in the BCS title game and not LSU. If they had made it to the BCS title game they probably beat Ohio State.

So unlike what you want to believe the Big East was very close to some BCS title game appearances while we were in it. We were just as close to a BCS title in 2006 and 2007 as the SEC was to a basketball NC in 2014 and 2015.

Oh and BTW, here's some of those BCS results from Big East teams during that period:
2005: WVU defeats SEC Champion Georgia
2006: UofL defeats ACC Champion Wake Forest
2007: WVU defeats Big 12 Champion Oklahoma
2011: WVU defeats ACC Champion Clemson (and from what I remember worse loss in school history)
2012: UofL defeats SEC Florida (who many thought should've been in the NC game)

The Big East was 5 - 3 in BCS bowl games over the 8 years UofL was in it. Yet you still want to say we couldn't compete with the big boys during that time period?


#2 The SEC wishes it had a year like the 2014 AAC, you mean like 2012. Your whole basis for that point is that because they won a title and the SEC never had a season like that...ignoring the fact that the SEC had a championship in 2012 and 2 out of 4 teams in the 2014 final 4.

Keep trying to go back to that and I'm going to ask the same question I keep asking. How many of those were achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? How many #1 seeds have been achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? How many Final Fours this decade have been achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? What if we put UK in the OVC and UK kept having success. Does that suddenly make the OVC a major conference?

Again I'm not trying to say UK and UF aren't good teams, but the SEC is complete dog meat once you get past UK and UF. The SEC IS Mid-Major once you get past UK and UF and should be treated like a mid-major conference. The other SEC teams could go to the American, MWC, West Coast type conferences and they still wouldn't win a conference title. That's the difference between the SEC and the ACC, Big 12, Big East (most years) and Big Ten (most years), we go more than 2 deep. The middle of the conference is where the SEC completely lacks.

The SEC has had 3 champions since the year 2000(Actually 3 since 2006), The ACC has had 6, the Big East(new/old) has had 5 titles(new Big East just 1), AAC 1 title, Big 12 1 title, and the Big 10 has not won a title since the 2000 Michigan State Spartans. And I used numbers for their conference at the time not current conference. Quit acting like the SEC is a mid major this year. Yes, it has been a weaker conference of the Power 5 as of lately...but 3 champions in 11 seasons(and a runner-up in there as well) is not a mid-major conference like an OVC. Not on the ACC's level...but not a bottom tier.

And once again how many of those 3 SEC National Champions were teams NOT named UK or UF? Sorry but once again I won't quit acting like the SEC is mid major this year, because the SEC as far as I'm concerned is a mid-major conference most years, and especially recently. Having one or two good teams is the very definition of a mid-major conference. I look at UK as not much different than Gonzaga, racking up wins in an easy conference against nobody opponents and because of it getting a seed higher than what they have probably truly earned. I don't think Gonzaga should've been a 1 seed and I don't think UK should've been a 2 seed.

Apples and oranges comparison as well, the AAC, which you try to compare yourself as better than, has been in existence for 4 years. The SEC has been in existence for almost 100 years! And yes I consider the AAC a mid-major conference as well, why do you think we were so happy when we were finally out of it after that year in purgatory?

The Big 12 and Big Ten you are right have not had a lot of success finishing the job and getting NC's, but are you really trying to say you are better than those 2 conferences top to bottom? The Big Ten since 2013 alone has had Michigan, Wisconsin, Michigan State and Ohio State reach the Final Four, that's twice the amount of teams the SEC has had reach the Final Four this decade! Since you want to use 2000 as the benchmark, since 2000 the Big Ten has had Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State and Illinois (not even including current conference member Maryland) represent the conference in the Final Four. In that same time frame only UK, UF and LSU have represented the SEC in the Final Four. That's over twice the amount if you include Maryland.

Since 2000 the Big 12 has had Kansas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas (not even including current conference member West Virginia) represent the conference in the Final Four. And that's coming from a conference that is smaller than the SEC. A 10 (formerly 12) team league with 5 of its members if you include West Virginia having reached the Final Four since 2000 vs. a 14 (formerly 12) team league with only 3 of its members having reach the Final Four since 2000. Which one do you think is better?

Beating your chest about your conference is on the level of UK football fans, is that really what you want your program to emulate? Considering you all are a powerhouse almost blue-blood level program, I'd think not.

Probably your most valid point. I know a lot of UofL fans try to be the better man vs UK fans. Sadly I'm not that way, I say if UK fans want to dish it out they better be able to take it. We had to hear you UK fans artificially pump your chest for years when SEC football teams won the National Title (like UK had won a National Title). We had to hear that stupid "SEC, SEC, SEC" chant from you UK fans since many in your fanbase are also Alabama football fans. We had to hear you UK fans talk about how the SEC was almost like playing in the NFL and how the Big East was so pathetic we didn't deserve a BCS bid even if we went undefeated.

So after hearing that for years I think myself and other UofL fans deserve to be able to pay it back to UK fans in basketball. Unlike UK football though, UofL basketball is actually able to back it up by our own play. We take pride in being a part of the ACC, but unlike UK football who hides behind Alabama and the SEC in football, we hide behind no one in basketball. I want to see an all ACC final four with our team coming home with the National Championship. If not us though I do want to see an ACC team bring it home, with the exception of Duke because of Grayson Allen.
 
UofL in 2006 ring a bell? We were one field goal away from going to the BCS title game. And I can tell you this Hoptown, while we may not have beaten Florida that year we sure would've given Florida a better game than Ohio State did. That I am sure of.

Nevermind WVU in 2007, they don't blow it against Pittsburgh they are in the BCS title game and not LSU. If they had made it to the BCS title game they probably beat Ohio State.

So unlike what you want to believe the Big East was very close to some BCS title game appearances while we were in it. We were just as close to a BCS title in 2006 and 2007 as the SEC was to a basketball NC in 2014 and 2015.

Oh and BTW, here's some of those BCS results from Big East teams during that period:
2005: WVU defeats SEC Champion Georgia
2006: UofL defeats ACC Champion Wake Forest
2007: WVU defeats Big 12 Champion Oklahoma
2011: WVU defeats ACC Champion Clemson (and from what I remember worse loss in school history)
2012: UofL defeats SEC Florida (who many thought should've been in the NC game)

The Big East was 5 - 3 in BCS bowl games over the 8 years UofL was in it. Yet you still want to say we couldn't compete with the big boys during that time period?




Keep trying to go back to that and I'm going to ask the same question I keep asking. How many of those were achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? How many #1 seeds have been achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? How many Final Fours this decade have been achieved by an SEC team not named UK or UF? What if we put UK in the OVC and UK kept having success. Does that suddenly make the OVC a major conference?

Again I'm not trying to say UK and UF aren't good teams, but the SEC is complete dog meat once you get past UK and UF. The SEC IS Mid-Major once you get past UK and UF and should be treated like a mid-major conference. The other SEC teams could go to the American, MWC, West Coast type conferences and they still wouldn't win a conference title. That's the difference between the SEC and the ACC, Big 12, Big East (most years) and Big Ten (most years), we go more than 2 deep. The middle of the conference is where the SEC completely lacks.



And once again how many of those 3 SEC National Champions were teams NOT named UK or UF? Sorry but once again I won't quit acting like the SEC is mid major this year, because the SEC as far as I'm concerned is a mid-major conference most years, and especially recently. Having one or two good teams is the very definition of a mid-major conference. I look at UK as not much different than Gonzaga, racking up wins in an easy conference against nobody opponents and because of it getting a seed higher than what they have probably truly earned. I don't think Gonzaga should've been a 1 seed and I don't think UK should've been a 2 seed.

Apples and oranges comparison as well, the AAC, which you try to compare yourself as better than, has been in existence for 4 years. The SEC has been in existence for almost 100 years! And yes I consider the AAC a mid-major conference as well, why do you think we were so happy when we were finally out of it after that year in purgatory?

The Big 12 and Big Ten you are right have not had a lot of success finishing the job and getting NC's, but are you really trying to say you are better than those 2 conferences top to bottom? The Big Ten since 2013 alone has had Michigan, Wisconsin, Michigan State and Ohio State reach the Final Four, that's twice the amount of teams the SEC has had reach the Final Four this decade! Since you want to use 2000 as the benchmark, since 2000 the Big Ten has had Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State and Illinois (not even including current conference member Maryland) represent the conference in the Final Four. In that same time frame only UK, UF and LSU have represented the SEC in the Final Four. That's over twice the amount if you include Maryland.

Since 2000 the Big 12 has had Kansas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas (not even including current conference member West Virginia) represent the conference in the Final Four. And that's coming from a conference that is smaller than the SEC. A 10 (formerly 12) team league with 5 of its members if you include West Virginia having reached the Final Four since 2000 vs. a 14 (formerly 12) team league with only 3 of its members having reach the Final Four since 2000. Which one do you think is better?



Probably your most valid point. I know a lot of UofL fans try to be the better man vs UK fans. Sadly I'm not that way, I say if UK fans want to dish it out they better be able to take it. We had to hear you UK fans artificially pump your chest for years when SEC football teams won the National Title (like UK had won a National Title). We had to hear that stupid "SEC, SEC, SEC" chant from you UK fans since many in your fanbase are also Alabama football fans. We had to hear you UK fans talk about how the SEC was almost like playing in the NFL and how the Big East was so pathetic we didn't deserve a BCS bid even if we went undefeated.

So after hearing that for years I think myself and other UofL fans deserve to be able to pay it back to UK fans in basketball. Unlike UK football though, UofL basketball is actually able to back it up by our own play. We take pride in being a part of the ACC, but unlike UK football who hides behind Alabama and the SEC in football, we hide behind no one in basketball. I want to see an all ACC final four with our team coming home with the National Championship. If not us though I do want to see an ACC team bring it home, with the exception of Duke because of Grayson Allen.
That's revisionist history if I have ever read it in my life.

So you are saying that the best Big East team you can come up with in that period "May not have beaten Florida" that year. So the best you can come up with is a team that would have given the champion "a better game"? And all you posted was some close but no cigar type teams that may have won with a few hundred technicalities on certain days that might have worked in their favor. Having close teams is not the same as having teams actually win the title.

At the end of the day, its about titles. As you all say around here, Calipari is a choke artist and an underachiever because Final 4's are not titles. The SEC has 3 in the last 11 seasons, The ACC has 3 in the last 11(no one not named Duke or UNC), Old Big East/AAC has 3(no one not named UCONN or UofL), the Big 12 has 1, and the NEW Big East has 1. I know it is very selective to go back just 11, but at the same time it shows where the rest of the nation is in relation. And not just UK and Florida, LSU made a Final 4 in 2006 with Big Baby. And no, I do not think the SEC is anywhere close to the ACC or old Big East, but I do think the competition of average teams with high level talent is not anything to thumb your nose at once again. I played/coached basketball, and no matter the level of competition, if you have decent athletes on the court its hard to win every night, especially with 18-23 year old kids. A team like Georgia may not win the SEC or make the tourney, but JJ Frazier would probably win conference player of the year in just about any small conference and Georgia would sweep through conferences like the OVC. Why? because there is a talent difference. Some of those conferences may have 1-2 teams like the MVC with Ill St. and Wich St., but teams like Evansville in those conferences would not win a single game in the SEC. And if you believe to the contrary, well I guess living in a UK-hate filled bubble.

Comparing the SEC to Gonzaga's conference the WCC and conferences like the OVC shows a complete lack of knowledge of factual information. And I understand, you don't believe that and you are just using it as trash talk because you want to discredit/talk-trash about anything Kentucky related. Again I understand, its human nature to do that and that's why I do not take it seriously when you all do that stuff. Ignoring experts, computer rankings, and factual logic in general are just things I don't believe anyone with a rational knowledge of the game of basketball would do when interpreting information.

And when you compare the Big 12 and B1G to the SEC and you talk about all the teams that have come close, I'll use the UK/Duke analogy. Kentucky has had more final 4's during Cal's period and more success over many seasons, but Duke has 2 championships and at the end of the day I would trade all of Cal's success for those 2 banners.

And if you behave like this because "WE HAD TO DEAL WITH UK FANS FOR YEARS" I am sorry your feelings were hurt. But you all are a top program with one of the greatest basketball coaches to ever walk the sidelines, who cares about UK not giving you all respect in the past. You all have the same respect as UK/Duke any program nationally at the moment, and that's because of your history and Pitino putting fear into any team that may face him.
 
And the point is????? The pathetic SEC has helped UK produced 8 championships, a ton of FF, 4 in the last 8 years, two championship games and gasp.....two wins in the Tournament over UofL....

So fine, the SEC is bad, horrible, pathetic as you point out, but so what? UK typically performs to expectations or exceeds in the tournament.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT