Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's funny how you guys downplay everything that's negative towards you, but cast stones toward us all of the time. I guess if you self report it, the NCAA will not punish you for doing it over and over. Drake is a POS that now has the tobacco chewing culture at Rupp listening to his gawd awful music.According to this article, the violation in question was Ulis taking a picture with Drake when they were both at a concert in Chicago. According to NCAA, it was "preferential treatment." Not sure that applies, but the NCAA is not exactly consistent on rules anyway.
http://www.foxsports.com/college-ba...ky-basketball-ncaa-secondary-violation-072216
It's funny how you guys downplay everything that's negative towards you, but cast stones toward us all of the time. I guess if you self report it, the NCAA will not punish you for doing it over and over. Drake is a POS that now has the tobacco chewing culture at Rupp listening to his gawd awful music.
The incident was minimal, but if it happens over and over (like it has) the punishment should be enough to put a stop to it....whatever that takesIn your opinion, what should the punishment be for this violation? Game suspensions, scholarship reduction?
In your opinion, what should the punishment be for this violation? Game suspensions, scholarship reduction?
It's funny how you guys downplay everything that's negative towards you, but cast stones toward us all of the time. I guess if you self report it, the NCAA will not punish you for doing it over and over. Drake is a POS that now has the tobacco chewing culture at Rupp listening to his gawd awful music.
I don't think the violation is because of the picture. It's the fact that a student athlete received a benefit (back stage access) and because he's a basketball player that other people are not privileged to or have to pay a considerable amount of moneyNot downplaying anything, nor casting stones. Not a fan of Drake either. I just think taking a picture is a stupid "violation", that is all.
I don't think the violation is because of the picture. It's the fact that a student athlete received a benefit (back stage access) and because he's a basketball player that other people are not privileged to or have to pay a considerable amount of money
Really? How do I become one of those "plenty of people" to get pulled back stage? I've been to a bunch of concerts, and that never happened to me.Ah, I can see that. Seems flaky as plenty of people get pulled back stage, not a unique situation. But quite frankly, I think the NCAA uses "impermissible benefits" as a very broad brush. That's not a UK thing, either, I just think the NCAA is a joke on enforcement.
Again, not about taking pictures, it's about getting backstage access that other (normal) people pay quite a few bucks for..Yawn. I wouldn't give a damn if a U of L player had his picture taken with J-Law and I don't give a damn if a UK player has his picture taken with Drake. What advantage is that providing for anyone? If it's a recruit, then I'd say it might be a different story, but with a guy who is already enrolled? Again - yawn.
Again, not about taking pictures, it's about getting backstage access that other (normal) people pay quite a few bucks for..
Also these schools have compliance people. The coaches and players know what is permissible or not. They just take the risk because they know they will get a slap on the wrist or not even that.
Actually its the reverse. If players can get in trouble watching strippers then players who get favors from Drake or other celebrities should be held accountable as well, because in a sense Drake is prostituting himself..
I agree as well but it just shows the bias against schools like U of L versus the so called elite programs like UK, Duke and UNC.
It's a combination of 3 things. Bias - Ineptness, - and corruption.I don't think it is a bias as much as it is total inconsistency on the NCAA's part. It's not a conspiracy, it's worse... it's ineptness!
It's a combination of 3 things. Bias - Ineptness, - and corruption.
Too much money involved now for corruption not to be embedded in the bureaucracy.