Threw in the towel last year to get his buyout. No other way around it now. It makes me realize also, what an actual piece of Sh he is .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was all BP's fault, but I have never bought into the idea that it was intentional. The man's ever declining personality prevented him from being a strong leader with the ability to assemble a competent staff.
I've gone back and forth on this. I started questioning things after the FSU game last year and soon came to believe that he didn't want to be here. My grandson spoke to several of the players after the Syracuse game who indicated to him that several of the coaches had basically checked out, that their fire was missing.Threw in the towel last year to get his buyout. No other way around it now. It makes me realize also, what an actual piece of Sh he is .
So if all of this is true, why is "Vince" continuing to pay the guy? How is not doing your job not grounds for termination for cause?...
I understand you can't sabotage your own contract and job performance. That's what's being widely alleged here.Because poor performance is not grounds for termination with cause. It's precious that you don't understand how contracts work...
You ain't "going after him" for anything. You already have the money. He's coming after you.Because going after him to collect on that $14 million is a waste of time, effort and money. You can have the OPINION that Petrino quit coaching on purpose in order to be fired and to collect his buyout, but it is impossible to prove. And it would be extremely easy for Petrino to show what he DID do each week until he was fired.
Having recently lost a parent, I’m convinced that the loss of his father affected him terribly. He should have taken leave. After we lost to FSU to go 0-2 in conference, his will was broken.
So if all of this is true, why is "Vince" continuing to pay the guy? How is not doing your job not grounds for termination for cause?...
This is about as good place to post what I learned from someone about this situation.
If some of you all can recall, apparently Mr. Patterson made it known that if we lost our baseball coach (let go) he would pursue getting back what he had given. There was also a lot talk about Coach Walz's tenure here too. None of which made any sense at the time.
Until you hear that new/temp administration wanted to get rid of the rest of the TJ hires. In other words, clean house of what was considered "bad hires".
So somewhere after the firing of Pitino and TJ's dismissal it was floated out that Petrino was next to go. It did not matter what he accomplished from that point forward. The writing was on the wall, he was gone.
His dad was gone and he was lost as to his situation. There was no one at the AD's office anymore to watch his back either.
Vince was put into a bad situation by some over zealous adims who literally crossed a boundary that they shouldn't of. It was also rumored that he wasn't going to get another dime out the University. So apparently he found a way to retain his money without going to court. Remember, Petrino was not on anyone's short list and TJ was often criticized openly about hiring him considering his recent past.
I left out some details due to time and length. Needless to say the situation got out of control fast and the program suffered.
I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing either given how the events played out either. When you stick your nose into someone's world to instigate change, most often you cause more harm than good.
Absolutely - that makes a ton of sense. Refuse to pay his contract - without a legal leg to stand on mind you and make him come after the university in court. I mean what’s a little more negative national publicity - amirite?You ain't "going after him" for anything. You already have the money. He's coming after you.
Apologists wanna talk outta both sides of their mouths. It was Petrino's fault, and "Vince" is right to pay him. You can't reconcile that...
You ain't "going after him" for anything. You already have the money. He's coming after you.
Apologists wanna talk outta both sides of their mouths. It was Petrino's fault, and "Vince" is right to pay him. You can't reconcile that...
Except Petrino could have put his head down and gone about his business in a professional manner. Coaches don’t typically get fired when they are running clean programs and winning - I don’t give a shit what sort of hard on grissom had for Petrino. Petrino’s problem is that he lacks grit / honor and, is a quitter. He quit in ATL, he quit on his wife and he quit on his team last year. He simply does not have what it takes to work through adversity. Future employers should heed the past. If only TJ would have.This is about as good place to post what I learned from someone about this situation.
If some of you all can recall, apparently Mr. Patterson made it known that if we lost our baseball coach (let go) he would pursue getting back what he had given. There was also a lot talk about Coach Walz's tenure here too. None of which made any sense at the time.
Until you hear that new/temp administration wanted to get rid of the rest of the TJ hires. In other words, clean house of what was considered "bad hires".
So somewhere after the firing of Pitino and TJ's dismissal it was floated out that Petrino was next to go. It did not matter what he accomplished from that point forward. The writing was on the wall, he was gone.
His dad was gone and he was lost as to his situation. There was no one at the AD's office anymore to watch his back either.
Vince was put into a bad situation by some over zealous adims who literally crossed a boundary that they shouldn't of. It was also rumored that he wasn't going to get another dime out the University. So apparently he found a way to retain his money without going to court. Remember, Petrino was not on anyone's short list and TJ was often criticized openly about hiring him considering his recent past.
I left out some details due to time and length. Needless to say the situation got out of control fast and the program suffered.
I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing either given how the events played out either. When you stick your nose into someone's world to instigate change, most often you cause more harm than good.
It all comes back to Vince NQ. Always.So if all of this is true, why is "Vince" continuing to pay the guy? How is not doing your job not grounds for termination for cause?...
It all comes back to "Vince" NQ. Always.
Petrino’s problem is that he lacks grit / honor and, is a quitter. He quit in ATL, he quit on his wife and he quit on his team last year. He simply does not have what it takes to work through adversity.
One piece of evidence I hear widely quoted as fact is that Petrino stopped recruiting and planning with his coaching staff. Stopped having meetings. With $14 million at stake, I think I could have done some homework to dig up a few other examples.Because proving it is different from knowing it. Its been shown that poor performance doesn't get schools out of a buyout. Amazing levels of incompetence haven't got schools out of buyout so how do you prove that Petrino intentionally quit vs was just doing a poor job? Or do you still think that Petrino was wronged by Tyra and he should still be here losing games?
What doesn't make sense is that some contracts are honored to the letter or to points that hard to explain (Petrino and Pizza Guy.)...It doesnt even make sense that Petrino would not have gotten his buyout if we won games and got fired.
Were clowns concerned about bad publicity when they refused to pay Pitino and Jurich? How much good publicity came our way when they did a 180 on Jurich?Absolutely - that makes a ton of sense. Refuse to pay his contract - without a legal leg to stand on mind you and make him come after the university in court. I mean what’s a little more negative national publicity - amirite?
Then you can add legal fees - possibly Petrino’s in addition to UofL’s - on top of the money he’s legally owed from the really bad contract given to him by TJ.
Then all of those former regime apologists would talk giddily about how bad Tyra is at his job and how he should have just paid the guy.
Reconcile that.
All the more indefensible to be paying the guy 100% of his buyout as "Vince" is doing...How can anyone defend petrinos performance and conduct after last year. The players have spoken and he was a pos.
Not my fault the guy is in the middle of most of the adverse garbage that comes U of L's way. I guess he should have followed your advice about being a short-timer...It all comes back to Vince NQ. Always.
All contracts should be honored. You beat up a lot on Vince NQ, but he wasn’t involved in the Pitino and Jurich situations. He has been consistent. All but one of the people who screwed up those two firings are gone.One piece of evidence I hear widely quoted as fact is that Petrino stopped recruiting and planning with his coaching staff. Stopped having meetings. With $14 million at stake, I think I could have done some homework to dig up a few other examples.
Would that allow U of L to escape completely?...Maybe not. But it sure as hell would serve as the basis for a negotiation process with NO MONEY as U of L's starting position. A point right in the middle would have been $7 million.
But no, "Vince" gave Petrino ALL of his money.
What doesn't make sense is that some contracts are honored to the letter or to points that hard to explain (Petrino and Pizza Guy.)
While others are ignored as if they didn't exist (Pitino and Jurich).
Impulsive, erratic, inexplicable clowns...
IIRC "Vince" was given undue credit when Pitino decided to fold his tent. Why didn't "Vince" walk into the negotiating room and say simply that "I'm honoring your contract" since that's the right thing to do?All contracts should be honored. You beat up a lot on Vince NQ, but he wasn’t involved in the Pitino and Jurich situations. He has been consistent. All but one of the people who screwed up those two firings are gone.
IIRC "Vince" was given undue credit when Pitino decided to fold his tent. Why didn't "Vince" walk into the negotiating room and say simply that "I'm honoring your contract" since that's the right thing to do?
Did "Vince" express any remorse that Pitino was leaving with nothing? I'm forgetting that.
"Vince" is a clown who was maybe 15 minutes last to the party...
Of all of the terrible takes you’ve had - “Pitino as the victim” might be the worst.IIRC "Vince" was given undue credit when Pitino decided to fold his tent. Why didn't "Vince" walk into the negotiating room and say simply that "I'm honoring your contract" since that's the right thing to do?
Did "Vince" express any remorse that Pitino was leaving with nothing? I'm forgetting that.
"Vince" is a clown who was maybe 15 minutes last to the party...
I'm not insisting on anything except consistency and explanations that hang together. There's an overused legal expression--"arbitrary and capricious". That defines the clowns almost perfectly.I’m certainly not in favor of a suit against Ramsey but it’s interesting that you’re advocating legal action by withholding Petrino’s buyout but decrying it when it comes to Ramsey’s situation? As far as I know, there wasn’t any federal investigation into why Petrino’s tenure - not so much with Ramsey.
Just curious - is there any situation that you support the university’s position on?
One piece of evidence I hear widely quoted as fact is that Petrino stopped recruiting and planning with his coaching staff. Stopped having meetings. With $14 million at stake, I think I could have done some homework to dig up a few other examples.
Would that allow U of L to escape completely?...Maybe not. But it sure as hell would serve as the basis for a negotiation process with NO MONEY as U of L's starting position. A point right in the middle would have been $7 million.
But no, "Vince" gave Petrino ALL of his money.
What doesn't make sense is that some contracts are honored to the letter or to points that hard to explain (Petrino and Pizza Guy.)
While others are ignored as if they didn't exist (Pitino and Jurich).
Impulsive, erratic, inexplicable clowns...
Not my fault the guy is in the middle of most of the adverse garbage that comes U of L's way. I guess he should have followed your advice about being a short-timer...
All contracts should be honored. You beat up a lot on Vince NQ, but he wasn’t involved in the Pitino and Jurich situations. He has been consistent. All but one of the people who screwed up those two firings are gone.
I certainly didn’t give Vince NQ credit for the Pitino surrender. I don’t recall anyone giving him credit. That was the ULAA more than anyone.IIRC "Vince" was given undue credit when Pitino decided to fold his tent. Why didn't "Vince" walk into the negotiating room and say simply that "I'm honoring your contract" since that's the right thing to do?
Did "Vince" express any remorse that Pitino was leaving with nothing? I'm forgetting that.
"Vince" is a clown who was maybe 15 minutes last to the party...
Because poor performance is not grounds for termination with cause. It's precious that you don't understand how contracts work.
And, I agree with the OP. Petrino is a piece of sh*# on a level that most people can't even comprehend. Just a bad human being.
you pick up a snake and it bites you, who do you blame,What typed of man does that to 100 kids and his family and himself? A very poor excuse of a man. I know BP has history of not being a trustworthy man, but something just doesn't make sense when you take your entire family down with the ship. I think he lost his mind!!!!!