Watching the huddle and Packer again is the only media I've yet seen that talks about how Louisville's absence with voters is peculiar. Tonight he said that most voters thought since the schedule is tougher than last season, Louisville won't win 10 games.
First off, that is condescending and evidence of bias and Packer was hinting at this. Think about it, what other conference champion runner up is picked 5th the following year with an obvious superior team than the season before?
But I have come to believe that last seasons schedule is actually tougher than this season. I know its been a common belief this season is much tougher.
I wonder.
Okay, we play seven teams we played last season.
GT
BC
ND
Pitt
Va
Mia
UK
Louisville beat 5 of those teams.
This season some may be better (GT) and some may not. (UK) Regardless, I don't see how playing these same teams this season is tougher than last season. ND on the road but Miami at home.
This season we replaced NC State and Virginia Tech with SMU and Clemson.
To me, this is a push. I still believe after unimpressive first games, both VT and NC State are better than SMU. And if Clemson turns up like FSU and loses 4 or more games, this change in schedule makes last seasons tougher.
Other than the two non conference cupcakes, the only other new opponent is Stanford in place of Duke. One could say Duke would be the tougher opponent this season. Again, at least a push. (Tie)
I think most people believe the schedule is tougher because of Clemson and that's it. I originally thought that but I'm not so sure, but it is just week 2.
Sorry for the novel for those impatient types. I'm just excited about the potential of this Louisville team.
First off, that is condescending and evidence of bias and Packer was hinting at this. Think about it, what other conference champion runner up is picked 5th the following year with an obvious superior team than the season before?
But I have come to believe that last seasons schedule is actually tougher than this season. I know its been a common belief this season is much tougher.
I wonder.
Okay, we play seven teams we played last season.
GT
BC
ND
Pitt
Va
Mia
UK
Louisville beat 5 of those teams.
This season some may be better (GT) and some may not. (UK) Regardless, I don't see how playing these same teams this season is tougher than last season. ND on the road but Miami at home.
This season we replaced NC State and Virginia Tech with SMU and Clemson.
To me, this is a push. I still believe after unimpressive first games, both VT and NC State are better than SMU. And if Clemson turns up like FSU and loses 4 or more games, this change in schedule makes last seasons tougher.
Other than the two non conference cupcakes, the only other new opponent is Stanford in place of Duke. One could say Duke would be the tougher opponent this season. Again, at least a push. (Tie)
I think most people believe the schedule is tougher because of Clemson and that's it. I originally thought that but I'm not so sure, but it is just week 2.
Sorry for the novel for those impatient types. I'm just excited about the potential of this Louisville team.