ADVERTISEMENT

Gotta figure out a way to scratch out a win today

Hopefully the 20 point loss to Cuse refocused these guys...

Tall order to win this game but we've shown in other games this year we're capable beating really good teams. Unfortunately we've also proven the opposite.

Need to get the train back on the tracks today with a win, another 20 + point loss could send us spiraling farther down.

Let's Go You Cards You. !!

Jawon Pass

I really liked what I read from Pass in a recent article about the new system they're running. The best thing he said was he's excited about how they're using the talent on offense instead of just them being out there.

That's exactly what I felt like last season. Why weren't we feeding the studs?

I'm more optimistic than I was. At least on offense.

FB RECRUITING: 2020 4-star WR set to visit Louisville in March

Pursuant to my guy Ryan Snyder who writes for the rivals.com Penn State site, 2020 4-star WR Michael Wyman has scheduled a visit to Louisville on March 7th.

Login to view embedded media
As you all know, Scott Satterfield is from North Carolina and so is Wyman. A while back I tweeted that I hope Louisville focuses on the triad and DMV areas of the country and Wyman is from the triad. When I expressed this sentiment I was greeted twitter backlash from those who took my words out of context. I wasn't saying that I hope the new staff focuses on the Triad and DMV rather than Georgia and Florida, but rather in addition to those hot beds. I thought this was a logical inference considering that Satterfield is plugged in down there but nuance isn't celebrated on social media in 2019. Regardless, there is a ton of talented players in North Carolina, DC, Virginia, and Maryland and the fact that Louisville is getting one of the most talented prospects from the triad area is encouraging.

Wyman is in high demand and boasts offers from programs such as Auburn, UGA, LSU, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Penn State, so on and so forth. Getting him on campus is a good sign.

Speaking of Auburn, Georgia, and Oklahoma, Wyman will visit Auburn on March 2nd and UGA on March 9th. He visited Oklahoma in April of 2018.

WBB bounces back against Virginia 71-49

A tale of two halves last night in Charlottesville, the Cards women's basketball team stumbling through most of the first half and trailing 25-28 after 20 minutes but waking up in the second half with a 46-21 advantage over the final twenty minutes to get the 71-49 win. For those crazy ACCNE announcers, Evans excellence and long range bombing, let's call in Colombo, Matlock, Perry Mason and NCIS to find out just who was wearing those Cardinal uniforms for most of the first half and sleuth over to:

FIVE THINGS ABOUT THIS GAME

5) Not our finest hour. Louisville looked sluggish, disorganized and complacent in the first half. The threes were not falling (3-16), rebounding and second chance opportunity were severely lacking and the Cards trailed by 10 at one point before staged a late second quarter rally to get within three. The first time this season UofL has trailed at the half. Trailing to a team they beat by almost 50 in Louisville a month ago. One can only imagine what Walz's halftime speech was like, but, it probably wasn't complements on shooting, awareness, efficiency or going to the boards.

4) "Firing Sam" The trained chimps that passed as the ACCNE announcers called Sam Fuehring Sam "Firing" at one point of the action. They also made the broadcast a two-hour infomercial for Virginia basketball and lauding to oh,so, great color analyst and former Cavalier player Lauren Moses. I guess you have to expect this. And, Sam wasn't "firing" too well in the first half. But, starting with the first play of the second half, Sam got better and ended with a stout 11 points and eight boards. I rescind the previous decision. Sam, you are not fired. You are employee of the week.
Somewhere, my buddy Don Russell is shaking his head and clutching his pronunciation guide.

3) These were good numbers. Louisville got 20 points off turnovers. UVA two. Louisville forced 18 turnovers against a Wahoo team that collapsed in the second half. Yes, the press had success. 12-2 on fast-break points for UofL and eighteen assists on 27 made baskets. 66.7% shooting for Walz's bunch in the game-changing third quarter and 50% marksmanship in the fourth. Five Cards in double figures and Kylee Shook went 4-5 in her 17 minutes. The Cavaliers were very tired at the end of this one and Louisville used that to their advantage.

2) mi Kasa es su Kasa I was very pleased to see Kasa Robinson get extended minutes and make the most of them. Five rebounds, which were a result of her non-stop hustle and solid defense. This freshman from Ashland continues to impress with her quickness and tenacity. She hasn't become a shooting threat yet, understandable on a squad that has a bunch of "makers" but she's doing the "non-stat sheet" things that are earning her the time and paying off for UofL. She is that key "eighth" player and depth in numbers is good to have as the season rolls on.

1) J.J. Airlines. She had a stretch in the third quarter where she grabbed a defensive rebound and went coast-to-coast for a layup and then got a steal and made another layup. That's the Jazmine Jones we all know and love and need the rest of the year. And she was turnover free in her 16 minutes. The Cards committed just six turnovers in the game and Dana had three of them. Dana was the leading scorer, though with 5 for 10 shooting and three long range threes. Evans excellence is always good to see. Coach Walz got one of those few errant Evans passes on the sidelines but wasn't in a shooting mood last night.

I'll take this win and pretend the first half didn't happen. I won't go back and watch the first half either. Maybe it was an underestimation and lack of respect for the foe. Maybe it was just a spectacular first half effort from UVA. Whatever this was, it was a "W" and the Cards go to 24-2 and share first place in the ACC with UND, since Va.Tech pulled the upset over Miami last night.

(Happy birthday Paulie. I cannot imagine life without you, or want to.)

-- Sonja --

Our Team

I fully support this team but I am starting to question some of the recurring issues from our players affecting their performance on the court.
1. Why does the team continue to accept zero effort from our only McDonald's player? In case you're guessing, VG King.
2. The development of Darius Perry is disappointing. He shows potential but this is year two for him. If he had improved as much as Jordan, we wold be in much better shape at the guard.
3. Our players seem to fall way too often when they are pressed. Particularly our guards. Since this is recurring I assume that little attention is being given to this weakness.
4. The two players above essentially represent our bench production when you include McManhon so as long as their production is minimal and they continue to make errors, we are six deep. That won't take us too far in any tournament. I forgot Enoch, who should be starting over Williams.
5. Just an observation. CRP always talked about modifying a players shot and we did see some improvement with some players. I noticed that Cunningham, Perry, and VG shoot flat shots with no air or little wrist action. That can be corrected and improve their accuracy.
6. You can't tell me that nobody on our team can consistently hit the 12 foot shot in the middle of a zone. If we hit that shot last night, we win. We better figure that one out or teams will press us and zone us and hold us to 30 to 40 points and lose our remaining games.

NYT: A Star’s Shoe Breaks, Putting College Basketball Under a Microscope

New York Times

By Marc Tracy and Kevin Draper

When the left sneaker of college basketball’s biggest star split open on national television Wednesday night 30 seconds into the biggest game of the season, what spilled out was not only his foot but also questions about the future of a marquee player and about the huge influence shoe companies hold over big-time college basketball.

The episode occurred in a game between the archrivals Duke and North Carolina. Zion Williamson, a Duke freshman, pivoted with the ball above the foul line, and the sheer force of his 285-pound frame and acrobatic versatility appeared to cut the shoe almost in two, as though severed by a sharp knife.

Former President Barack Obama, sitting on the sidelines at the Duke arena, was seen on video pointing at Williamson and appearing to say, “His shoe broke.”

As the scene was replayed on countless highlight shows on Thursday, the damaged shoe threatened to become a nightmare for Nike, which pays tens of millions to elite college sports programs to be the exclusive sponsor for teams and supplier of their footwear.

For a quarter of a century, Nike has been paying Duke tens of millions of dollars to sponsor its teams, and to ensure that its athletes wear only footwear bearing the company’s ubiquitous logo. The players receive enough shoes to carry them through the season, allowing them to serve largely as free human billboards.

“All this does,” Gabe Feldman, who directs Tulane’s sports law program, said of Williamson’s injury, “is put a magnifying glass on an issue that has existed for a long time.”

Williamson has not commented.

Nike stock closed down Thursday by 1.05 percent, as the world wondered how a sneaker could split so badly in the middle of a game.

The answer remains a puzzle even to experts. James Gilbert, an orthopedic surgeon who worked with Duke athletics in the 1990s, said he had seen shoes fall apart similarly on soccer players, but never on the hardwood.

“I think it’s a product failure,” Gilbert said. “I’ve never seen that. I had no idea that that happens.”

In a statement Wednesday night, Nike said: “We are obviously concerned and want to wish Zion a speedy recovery. The quality and performance of our products are of utmost importance.” The statement called the shoe explosion “an isolated occurrence,” though in 2015, the Kenyan marathoner Eliud Kipchoge won the Berlin Marathon even as the insoles of his Nike shoes slipped out of place.

Williamson, who has a mild knee sprain, will probably be sidelined for one to two weeks, and then continue being the favorite to become the No. 1 overall pick in the N.B.A. draft in June. By then, he will probably already be a millionaire, because of the endorsement deals he can sign when he ends his college career. For now, he is an N.C.A.A. amateur.

Standout basketball players were squeezed further in 2006, when the N.B.A. barred talented teenagers from following in the footsteps of Kobe Bryant, Kevin Garnett and LeBron James by entering the league straight out of high school.

Sneaker companies first became deeply involved with college athletics in the late 1970s, when an enterprising Nike executive, Sonny Vaccaro, arranged for several prominent coaches, such as John Thompson of Georgetown and Jerry Tarkanian of Nevada-Las Vegas, to receive money in exchange for outfitting their players in the company’s shoes. Starting in the late 1980s, Nike began to sign deals that covered all of a university’s teams.

“Now we see the kids wearing the shoes and selling the product all over the world — and the kids never got anything,” Vaccaro, who left Nike years ago, said Thursday. “The money has served the same people, except for the most important ones.”

A decision in a federal class-action lawsuit challenging N.C.A.A. restrictions on compensation is expected any day.

Then, in September 2017, federal prosecutors in New York’s Southern District revealed more of the chasm between college basketball players, who can receive only scholarships and related costs of being on campus, and the administrators and coaches who reap the benefits of the revenue the athletes generate for their colleges, conferences and the N.C.A.A. itself. The men’s basketball tournament yields about $1 billion a year for the television rights.

In three complaints filed in United States District Court in New York, prosecutors accused roughly a dozen assistant coaches, middlemen and employees of Adidas of plotting to funnel money to players’ families in exchange for pledges that the athletes, among other things, would play for certain universities and sign with Adidas once they began their pro careers. The scandal led to the firing of a Hall of Fame coach, Rick Pitino of the University of Louisville, and has
netted three convictions, including of Adidas’s former director of global sports marketing.

The transactions outlined by the complaints are practically the modus operandi at many top basketball programs, documents and testimony in the legal case suggested. Wiretaps revealed suspects describing at least one Adidas rival engaging in similar practices. Documents from the case reported by Yahoo Sports last year indicated that former top players at dozens of prominent programs — including Duke — had been on the payroll of an aspiring agent who has since been convicted of fraud.

Duke did not reply to requests for comment Thursday.

The specifics of Duke’s deal with Nike, which the two sides have extended through 2027, are not publicly known. As a private university, Duke is not obligated to reveal the terms.

But a look at Nike deals with similar universities that are public offer some indication of how the contracts work.

Nike’s deal with North Carolina, for instance, will give the university more than $90 million in cash and merchandise over 10 years. Nike also signed personal contracts with a number of North Carolina coaches: Roy Williams, the men’s basketball coach, will receive an average of $300,000 a year over the life of the 10-year agreement.



Contracts generally state that Nike is not liable for injuries suffered by athletes wearing its products. The contracts also require every player to wear the company’s shoes unless a medical condition makes Nike footwear unsuitable. A player might, as stipulated in Nike’s deal with the University of Michigan, be required to make himself available for examination by Nike or a local podiatrist before using a shoe made by another company.

It is not known why Williamson wore the particular Nike model that tore on Wednesday. It was a Nike “signature shoe,” a term for a style endorsed by a specific athlete — in this case, the N.B.A. star Paul George, who plays for the Oklahoma City Thunder.

What makes Williamson so compelling is the same thing that might make a shoe unable to contain him. He combines size and speed with strength and agility in the manner of James, who during a day off this month went to Charlottesville, Va., to see Williamson and the Blue Devils take on Virginia. Though Williamson weighs 285 pounds, at times he seems like the fastest player on the court.

“When you’re dealing with some of these athletes who are getting quicker, stronger, faster, you’ve got to consider some of that,” said Gilbert, the orthopedist.

Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Washington Post on Zion and Paying Athletes

This is the stuff that, along with the Alston case, is going to ensure that college athletes get paid.

Washington Post
By Sally Jenkins
Columnist
February 21 at 11:35 AM

"This is what happens when everyone gets paid but the guy who is really earning the money. If Zion Williamson were allowed to be paid like he damn well should be by Nike, a faulty sneaker would not be quite so future-threatening, because, see, he was getting paid to wear it. It’s all very straightforward and simple. Pay him. But the men with no fingerprints won’t permit it, those athletic directors and presidents who have subverted college athletics into a rake-off while pretending to govern them."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...51b7ff322e9_story.html?utm_term=.d98388b83fe1

Sound Familiar?

Good Read on Florida State financial issues.

https://floridastate.rivals.com/new...crunch-but-coburn-sees-light-at-end-of-tunnel

FSU faces financial crunch, but Coburn sees light at end of tunnel

snippet:

"While soaring operating expenses are an issue for every college athletics program, Coburn said the Seminoles’ current predicament is compounded by a handful of big-ticket, one-time expenditures.

There was the buyout FSU had to pay to hire Willie Taggart away from Oregon, which according to published reports was about $4.5 million. Since then, FSU has picked up more expenses related to the hiring and firing of several assistant coaches. Coburn said all of those payments will be on the books for another two or three years.

The Seminoles also are paying off the new HD scoreboards and ribbon boards that were installed in Doak Campbell Stadium before the 2016 and ‘17 seasons. FSU also has had to invest about $4.5 million in infrastructure and technology to prepare for the new ACC linear television network, which is set to launch later this year.

And then there have been other unanticipated costs, including a newly enacted 21-percent excise tax on salaries in excess of $1 million.

When Coburn left his full-time position as chief of staff for FSU President John Thrasher and took over the athletics department, one of the first things he did was cut expenses by freezing vacant positions, eliminating non-essential travel and reducing administrative costs. That helped somewhat, slicing about $600,000 from a nearly $110 million budget.

But now that he has been in this position for nearly six months, Coburn said he knows there are too many fixed costs to balance the budget by trimming.

“Over the long term, because so many of our costs are fixed – coaching salaries, scholarships and recruiting -- [the solution] is going to lie in revenues,” he said. “I’m working at it every day. We’re going to drive some revenues to this place.”

Intramural Offense

That zone offense looked like something my fraternity intramural team would run. The players execution of it looked about as good as a high school team.

Sutton had no business at the high post. He couldn’t make a 10 ft jump shot and half the time he didn’t even look to shoot.

McMahon was jacking up bombs 6 feet outside the 3-pt line.

Perry reverted back to his careless ball handling.

FB RECRUITING: Some impressive visitors on the horizon for Louisville football

Just wanted to drop on by with some more good news on the visitor front. For this weekend Louisville is expecting two top local targets, Izayah Cummings and John Young.

While those are impressive, the staff are working on setting up some more visits for next weekend and are hopeful the following prospects will be here then.

Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Obviously Carrington Valentine has been around the Louisville program quite a bit and it wouldn't surprise me if the Cardinals were the early frontrunner here. Also, this would be Darrion Henry and Paris Johnson's second visit to Louisville this month. Are the Cardinals a legitimate option for those two highly coveted prospects? I asked a source who stated they weren't entirely sure how legit their interest is but that the staff "isn't just going to back down from Ohio State". I was also told that being at least in the mix with this caliber of prospect "is going to be the norm around here".

Thoughts Or Predictions For Syracuse Game?

I'll admit I haven't seen Cuse play once this season. What do the Cards need to look out for? Which players are dangerous? Etc.

I'm very curious to see how CCM tackles the Cuse zone. For some reason we had CC in the middle of the zone against Duke. I realize it is two different teams but it seems Nwora or someone else would be better situated there if Mack plays it that way.

Estimate of Annual Media Income per Conference Team

The (San Jose) Mercury News has been doing a continuing analysis of the PAC-12 media revenue "shortfall" situation (relative to the other four P5's) for some time. The recent "shockwave" announcement by the PAC-12 has rekindled their investigation and analysis. In the announcement the PAC-12 has proposed selling up to 10% of the Conference Network for cash, a lot of cash. This action would be taken because the PAC-12's own network it operates itself has failed to bring in anywhere near the amount of revenue it needs to continue.

The full article is in the link below.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/02...-erase-the-revenue-gap-within-the-power-five/

What makes their "data" interesting is they show what all the conferences receive in media dollars per team today, and also what they expect all of them will receive in just a few more years.

And the ACC is in some trouble if these projections hold. Being behind the SEC and Big Ten is one thing. But trailing the pack is bad. Coaching and Recruiting implications.

Here is what they project the P5's to get in the near future per team:

SEC: $61.5 million per school
Big Ten: $51 million per school
Pac-12: $39.5 million per school
Big 12: $38 million per school
ACC: $34.5 million per school

Note the ACC amount is post-ACCN implementation. Here is their logic:

"Next, let’s consider the ACC’s linear network, which launches in the fall.

Revenue projections from the conference, as laid out by former Florida State athletic director Stan Wilcox, show each school receiving a whopping $8 million-to-$10 million initially, with that figure rising to $10 million-to-$15 million once the network is mature.

The Hotline is skeptical of those figures, based on conversations with media industry sources. We’ll calculate 50 cents actual for every dollar projected, then target that figure at the middle of the range laid out by Wilcox.

So half of $12.5 million — the middle of the range of payouts for a mature network — brings us to about $6.25 million per school."

CANES CLUB CARDS 79-74

You score more points, you win. A tough loss to a hot-shooting Miami WBB squad yesterday for Louisville. I'm done kicking things, pouting and watching replays. Plenty of season left. For the divine "Ms. B.", the not-so divine "other Ms. B", questions on a third "Ms. B." -- let's avoid Emese Hof in the paint and make our way to:

FIVE THINGS ABOUT THIS GAME

5) The divine "B".
I love Robbie Bartlett. After a great chat with her in the media room pre-game, we saw "Robs" come out and deliver a fantastic, soulful rendition of the National Anthem in front of 12193 fans, mostly dressed in pink for the Play 4 Kay game. She revealed to me she still gets nervous before honoring our nation with song. Sure couldn't tell it. The Louisville legend still has it.

4) The less than divine "B". Beatrice Mompremier is an imposing 6'5" post for Miami. Louisville managed to frustrate, contain and render her ineffective for her 30 minutes of court-time yesterday. Just eight points and seven grabs for the Baylor transfer. The Canes have another talented paint dweller in Emese Hof, though, and she teamed up with fellow Netherlands resident, guard Laura Cornelius to take it to the Cards.

3) The absence of "B". Bionca Dunham never got on the court in the crucial fourth quarter, after registering 12 points and eight rebounds in the previous three quarters. No ailments or injury, just a coach's decision. Miami scored 32 points in the fourth and 12 were from the paint. Not questioning at all the decision by Walz, just wondering if she might have been able to halt Hof.

2) Thinking highly of Kylee. With 4-5 three-point shooting, 12 points and an incredible, SportsCenter quality block in the first half -- Kylee came to play. The junior continues to get better each game and her 26 minutes were quality. Sometimes, though, teams shoot the ball well against other teams and Miami's 55.1% floor performance was, eventually, the deciding factor.

1) Off afternoon for "Nite-nite". Although she led the Cards with 16 points, it was an afternoon to forget for the All-American senior from beyond the arc. 1-10. Ouch. The Cards were bombing from outside (34 attempts) but only 11 went in (32.4%). That late fourth quarter sequence where the Cards saw a 66-63 lead disappear featured three turnovers and only two shots in three minutes.

Tear off the rear view mirror, look out the front windshield and continue driving Cards. A three-way tie atop the ACC now and huge matchup tonight between two-losses NC State and Notre Dame in Raleigh. The Cards head to Charlottesville Thursday next -- for some Cavalier action.

-- sonja --

My observations

Our counter to the zone was awful. This is!’t the first time we had seen a zone this season. This isnt the first time these players have played against it at any level. What gives? At first I thought we might be rope-a-doping Syracuse. But we weren’t. This team seriously has a mental and emotional problem right now. Hopefully Mack has the right words to snap them the hell out of it.

WTH happened to CC? This guy has been poised and money all season, and ever since FSU has played like he’s got a massive debt to pay off.

How many times did our guys pass up the open pass to McMahon - whose ability was needed against the 2-3. I saw Malik do it twice. I saw Jordan do it. I saw CC do it. Their body language told a story that I started to notice when Agau was in the game early in the season. McMahon is open, player looks, then opts for option 2. What is going on there?

Speaking of Malik...I have been so proud of his progression and developmemt this season. But this game he did not show up. On one possesion in the first half, he gets the ball in the post, passes up the pass to McMahon, passes to someone else, it makes its way to McMahon who takes a deep three and Malik was in prime position for the offensive rebound but doesn’t so much as raise his arms. He literally just watched a guard snag the rebound right next to him. Actually, he was on the baseline, so the guard snagged the rebound behind him. He may have side-stepped it. I know he did nothing but watch the ball, and his body language said “f*ck it”

This team needs to get its head right. Something is going on. They are falling apart at the wrong time of the season.
  • Like
Reactions: Guardman and gocds
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT